should he get involved?
#1
Posted 2009-October-12, 13:27
#2
Posted 2009-October-12, 13:57
The infliction of cruelty with a good conscience is a delight to moralists that is why they invented hell. Bertrand Russell
#3
Posted 2009-October-12, 14:20
The issue is that Limbaugh is perceived as a racist. He made comments about Donovan McNabb being "overrated because he's black" during a short-lived stint as a football commentator. He has also made statements comparing the NFL to gang warfare.
The NFL is about 2/3 black. Many of the players do not like Limbaugh and have stated that they would refuse to play for a team he owned. Letting Limbaugh into the exclusive owner's club may simply be bad business.
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#4
Posted 2009-October-12, 14:24
luke warm, on Oct 12 2009, 02:27 PM, said:
I think he is right for purely business reasons. It would be suicide for the NFL to have him own a team, from the standpoint of ticket sales alone. People who love him but weren't seeing football are unlikely to start spending big bucks to watch a sport they don't like. But people who hate him and were seeing football would probably stop coming to games on a large scale.
#5
Posted 2009-October-12, 14:36
#6
Posted 2009-October-12, 14:38
#7
Posted 2009-October-12, 14:51
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#8
Posted 2009-October-12, 15:39
Seems to me that Limbaugh and the NFL deserve each other.
#9
Posted 2009-October-13, 15:57
awm, on Oct 12 2009, 03:51 PM, said:
that's true, but it's just as true that free agents aren't as important as some think (re: redskins)... after further review, i think the owners are the only ones who can stop him... if he does get in and builds a winner, the fans and players will come
#10
Posted 2009-October-13, 16:31
Call me Desdinova...Eternal Light
C. It's the nexus of the crisis and the origin of storms.
IV: ace 333: pot should be game, idk
e: "Maybe God remembered how cute you were as a carrot."
#11
Posted 2009-October-13, 17:00
I don't want to hijack this thread, after all it's about Limbaugh potentially owning an NFL team (not that the Rams would qualify as such...) of which I don't have much of an opinion.
#12
Posted 2009-October-14, 16:16
Lobowolf, on Oct 13 2009, 05:31 PM, said:
i can, i think... see if anyone from the rams wants to swap places with his counterpart on the raiders
#13
Posted 2009-October-14, 16:28
Besides, Al Davis has to die SOMEDAY. Doesn't he?
Call me Desdinova...Eternal Light
C. It's the nexus of the crisis and the origin of storms.
IV: ace 333: pot should be game, idk
e: "Maybe God remembered how cute you were as a carrot."
#14
Posted 2009-October-15, 04:02
#15
Posted 2009-October-15, 06:15
crazy4hoop, on Oct 13 2009, 06:00 PM, said:
I don't want to hijack this thread, after all it's about Limbaugh potentially owning an NFL team (not that the Rams would qualify as such...) of which I don't have much of an opinion.
I think the over/under would be higher than that -- they're both bad on defense too.
I don't think players would care if Limbaugh owned a team. I can see them running their mouths about it, but really... Say he buys the team. Then... nothing. Football as usual.

Help
