Lauria-Versace respond 3♣ to an opening bid of 1♠ with an invitational hand with 6♥. Does anybody know how it continues after this?
Steven
Page 1 of 1
Lauria-Versace's 3C response to 1S
#2
Posted 2009-October-06, 09:46
Do they really play that? I could see it having merit if you put more hands into the bid than simply invitational with 6 hearts.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
#3
Posted 2009-October-06, 10:01
I just read their published card. 2H/1S is only forcing to 3H, so it is unlikely they need two ways to show the same thing. Or, maybe they have changed it.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#4
Posted 2009-October-06, 17:04
I play something similar, where 1♠-P-3♦ shows an invitational hand with hearts. 1♠-P-3♥ is the functional equivalent of the Bergen 3♦, just bumped up a space to add preemption. I'd imagine bumping 3♣ up to 3♦ might also have some value, making 3♣ the preemptive call.
There's nothing really special about this. It's just a restructuring to add more preemption. I bet they have the same idea in mind.
There's nothing really special about this. It's just a restructuring to add more preemption. I bet they have the same idea in mind.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
Page 1 of 1

Help
