I'll give you another one:
(3S)-4C Gerber.
I'm guessing that if an opening 4C is Gerber, an opening 4NT is Blackwood? Or have they got the Specific Ace Ask?
adjust? hypothetical, anywhere
#22
Posted 2009-October-06, 23:53
mycroft, on Oct 7 2009, 02:01 AM, said:
I'll give you another one:
(3S)-4C Gerber.
I'm guessing that if an opening 4C is Gerber, an opening 4NT is Blackwood? Or have they got the Specific Ace Ask?
(3S)-4C Gerber.
I'm guessing that if an opening 4C is Gerber, an opening 4NT is Blackwood? Or have they got the Specific Ace Ask?
I am fairly sure that for the pair that opened a Gerber 4♣ against me 4NT was 28-30 balanced.
Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#23
Posted 2009-October-07, 02:52
mycroft, on Oct 6 2009, 07:01 PM, said:
I'm guessing that if an opening 4C is Gerber, an opening 4NT is Blackwood? Or have they got the Specific Ace Ask?
They won't have heard of that; it is Lesson 99. And yes they will play that 1NT-4NT is Blackwood AND 1NT-4C is Gerber.
As bluejak says in another thread they deserve sympathy; "forgive them for they know not what they do".
I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar

Help
