BBO Discussion Forums: Five level decision - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Five level decision

#1 User is offline   plaur 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 313
  • Joined: 2005-April-03

Posted 2009-October-03, 16:50

Scoring: IMP

1♥-2♥-p-2♠
3♥-4♦-4♥-4♠
5♥-p-p-X
all pass - down 1

North opened 1♥. I bid 2♥ and followed up with 4♦.
Neither knew partners style, but the agreement on Micheals was: Not vul you have less than an opener, Vul you need more values. Partner told me he dont need to be 5-5 to Micheals. I generally like to be 5-5, but never got around to tell partner.
What do you think of the bidding?
0

#2 User is offline   andy_h 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,962
  • Joined: 2007-September-14
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.

Posted 2009-October-04, 10:12

West should have bid 4♠ after hearing partner making a Michaels cue-bid. With such a good fit and a decent hand and not knowing if partner's Michaels bid was weak or not you'll be either bidding to make or sacrifice)

What your partner mentioned about not needing to be 5-5 to michaels, imo, is a very bad idea. Some 5m4S hands are suitable for a X or a 2m overcall so I prefer not to have those type of hands in my Michaels bid. And plus, by having it as 5-5 you can be sure to bid up to the limit (like 4♠) here with a 9+ fit and that can be very useful sometimes in terms of preemptive measures. So I guess that is why your partner 'only' bid 2♠ because he thought the partnership may only have a total of 8spades. But even still he could have found some way to invite.
- Andy -

We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users