Unusual balancing situation
#1
Posted 2009-October-03, 13:32
1♣ (1♠) P (P)
?
#2
Posted 2009-October-03, 13:42
jdonn, on Oct 3 2009, 02:32 PM, said:
1♣ (1♠) P (P)
?
Okay, I'll bite but I don't gotta like it ....2♦ no doubt it is IMPS and colors are unfavorable
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#3
Posted 2009-October-03, 13:45
#4
Posted 2009-October-03, 13:52
#5
Posted 2009-October-03, 14:08
matmat, on Oct 3 2009, 02:52 PM, said:
I might want to defend a heart PARTIAL if I reopen this.
-P.J. Painter.
#6
Posted 2009-October-03, 14:37
2♦ is nucking futz.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#7
Posted 2009-October-03, 15:17
Another companion hand for the guy who had nine hearts to the jack and out?
#8
Posted 2009-October-04, 10:04
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#10
Posted 2009-October-04, 10:26
#11
Posted 2009-October-04, 11:58
#12
Posted 2009-October-04, 13:39
#13
Posted 2009-October-04, 14:15
#14
Posted 2009-October-04, 14:17
Partner could have something like xx Qxx Qxxxx Kxx and we make 5♦ or maybe 3NT. But it's more likely they can outbid us in hearts. Of course if LHO has psyched and partner has a trap pass this could be a spectacular failure. If the vulnerability and opponent made psyching a decent possibility I might try 2♦.
#15
Posted 2009-October-04, 15:23
xx
JTxxx
Qxx
xxx
Opps are welcome to play 2♥ here...
#16
Posted 2009-October-04, 16:51
jdonn, on Oct 4 2009, 03:15 PM, said:
Uh yes, because partner might have 5-card support and a singleton?
I would still pass though, especially as 2♦ is probably badly defined (i.e., as showing diamonds, not implying longer clubs).
#17
Posted 2009-October-05, 00:05
cherdanno, on Oct 4 2009, 05:51 PM, said:
jdonn, on Oct 4 2009, 03:15 PM, said:
Uh yes, because partner might have 5-card support and a singleton?
I would still pass though, especially as 2♦ is probably badly defined (i.e., as showing diamonds, not implying longer clubs).
I don't think gib will have that but maybe I'm wrong? More that he would have some hands with 5 or 6 hearts and pass where I think doubling (if not bidding) is automatic.
Anyway I bid 2♦ (would pass 100% in real life), lho gib made a rather poor 2♥ bid on a mediocre 5422 hand, and partner was 2632 with KJT8xx of hearts and almost nothing else, so they were in trouble no matter what. They escaped relatively unscathed when rho gib went back to 2♠ on his 2344 and they went down 2 undoubled.

Help
