Skill level description Some people are wildy out
#1
Posted 2008-December-20, 03:38
The other day I played against a self proclaimed "World Class" player who was surprised to find that P played his cards when he was dummy!!
Could I suggest that all members be encouraged to adopt a common basis for asessing skill levels.
Beginner less than 6 months palying experience
Novice 6-12 months experience
It would be helpful if such players stayed in the relaxed bridge club and that (if possible) their scores did not influnce that awarded to other players. As it is, I think that some of the extreme range of results we now see is caused by such players getting things completely wrong.
Intermediate Probably the majority of players; typically average club standard.
Advanced Represented their club in a competition a a decent standard, won cups or other open tournaments or reached say top 10 in competition such as the Charity Shield.
There might be subclasses AS and ES for players who had reached that standard but found that advancing age took the edge off their concentration and judgement. (Basically, they know what to do, but can't always manage to do it)
Expert Regularly represented their state or (major) city.
World class Represented the country at internationa level. (personally, I do not think such players would find BBO enough of a challenge to interest them, except perhaps for teaching)
#2
Posted 2008-December-20, 04:15
jw_rob2, on Dec 20 2008, 09:38 AM, said:
Many do play on BBO, believe me.
I don't understand your suggestion, when I created my account I found info where it stated what skill I was suposed to put myself into depending on things liek you said, so people is encouraged to do it.
#3
Posted 2008-December-20, 04:48
Welcome to the forums btw
#4
Posted 2008-December-20, 09:08
what do you suggest be done to force people to follow them?
#5
Posted 2008-December-20, 09:42
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
Our ultimate goal on defense is to know by trick two or three everyone's hand at the table. -- Mike777
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#6
Posted 2008-December-20, 09:52
blackshoe, on Dec 20 2008, 10:42 AM, said:
i doubt that would work.
#7
Posted 2008-December-20, 10:00
Perhaps occasionally repeated links to the skill description in the News on BBO could be of help to those who really do not know and serve as a little reminder to those who deliberately misrepresent their skill level.
#8
Posted 2008-December-20, 13:23
matmat, on Dec 20 2008, 03:52 PM, said:
blackshoe, on Dec 20 2008, 10:42 AM, said:
i doubt that would work.
no, but it could be fun
#9
Posted 2008-December-20, 14:03
sceptic, on Dec 20 2008, 07:23 PM, said:
matmat, on Dec 20 2008, 03:52 PM, said:
blackshoe, on Dec 20 2008, 10:42 AM, said:
i doubt that would work.
no, but it could be fun
If its the first time to be tried, it would be a scientific test, and since it is in the name os science, it is ok (that's what my old physic's teacher used to say more or less).
#10
Posted 2008-December-20, 14:21
Much prefer Black Leather Basque (or Blood Red) and Leather Whip with nine Tails
#11
Posted 2008-December-22, 17:38
Or just an operator,organiser,columnist of some regional&national&international events. Shortly prospects are not bright at table
Even mostly nonplaying capt. or coach etc.
They can carry star symbols, post World Class skill level.
No big deal. In my local clubs just "friendly" opponents. So I do not think similar self issued diplome owners shatter the world.
It's not my scale then not my fancy. Private skill level OK with me.
Here is some memorable quote :
A Few Good Men (1992) Nominated for 4 Oscars. Another 7 wins & 14 nominations
Director:Rob Reiner
Writers (WGA):Aaron Sorkin (play&screenplay)
Tom Cruise, Jack Nicholson, Demi Moore
Kaffee: You don't need a patch on your arm to have honor.
#12
Posted 2008-December-22, 18:49
- hrothgar
#13
Posted 2008-December-22, 19:03
#14
Posted 2008-December-22, 19:03
#15
Posted 2008-December-22, 19:16
#16
Posted 2008-December-22, 19:26
han, on Dec 23 2008, 02:49 AM, said:
I've full respect real expertise. I can understand "th others" reasons. They might think to launch another jukebox
MarkDean may try :
http://www.worldbridge.org/people/
#17
Posted 2008-December-22, 21:48
Trumpace, on Dec 22 2008, 08:16 PM, said:
At money bridge (come to think of it: in most online bridge) I don't take the self-rated skill level much into consideration. I am not that good anyway, and I don't think I vary my game much, depending on the level of the opponents (Not that I don't take free extra chances).
All in all - I trust the game I see, and the players I´ve read about
I haved actually seen a lot of expert players change their profile to "novice" or the like when they go to money bridge - probably to try and lure the lambs in.
#18
Posted 2008-December-22, 21:57
#19
Posted 2008-December-22, 23:12
H_KARLUK, on Dec 23 2008, 08:26 AM, said:
han, on Dec 23 2008, 02:49 AM, said:
I've full respect real expertise. I can understand "th others" reasons. They might think to launch another jukebox
MarkDean may try :
http://www.worldbridge.org/people/
Please explain. I have no idea what this means.
#20
Posted 2008-December-23, 00:25
jdonn, on Dec 22 2008, 08:03 PM, said:
good thing for you the forums ain't Brighton.

Help