When IMPs becomes MPs Final Board of a Garozzo Match
#1
Posted 2009-September-27, 16:21
xxx
Txx
AK9xx
xx
Red/Red, LHO (Valerie Westheimer) opens 1♣, partner bids 2♣ michaels, and RHO (Lynn Deas) passes. You bid 2♥, which nets 3♣ from LHO passed back to you.
(1♣)-2♣-(P)-2♥
(3♣)-P-(P)-?
What is your bid?
#2
Posted 2009-September-27, 16:34
Not sure whether I like the original 2♥ call.
I understand the motivation. The 10 is a lot nicer than an x. However, this leaves you in something of a pickle.
I think I prefer 2♠ spades to start, planning to rebid 3♥ if 3♣ gets sent back to you.
#3
Posted 2009-September-27, 17:28
hrothgar, on Sep 27 2009, 05:34 PM, said:
Not sure whether I like the original 2♥ call.
I understand the motivation. The 10 is a lot nicer than an x. However, this leaves you in something of a pickle.
I think I prefer 2♠ spades to start, planning to rebid 3♥ if 3♣ gets sent back to you.
I don't think the prepared 2S bid is necessary unless partner is prone to perpetrating Michaels with a four card major. So, now it is just to decide whether to bid 3H or not. I smell two diamonds a diamond ruff and two major suit tricks on defense and a good chance of losing 5 or six tricks on offense. pass.
#4
Posted 2009-September-27, 18:01
aguahombre, on Sep 28 2009, 02:28 AM, said:
hrothgar, on Sep 27 2009, 05:34 PM, said:
Not sure whether I like the original 2♥ call.
I understand the motivation. The 10 is a lot nicer than an x. However, this leaves you in something of a pickle.
I think I prefer 2♠ spades to start, planning to rebid 3♥ if 3♣ gets sent back to you.
I don't think the prepared 2S bid is necessary unless partner is prone to perpetrating Michaels with a four card major. So, now it is just to decide whether to bid 3H or not. I smell two diamonds a diamond ruff and two major suit tricks on defense and a good chance of losing 5 or six tricks on offense. pass.
I don't advocate a 2♠ followed by 3♥ sequence because I am worried about identifying the best major suit fit. I'm not expecting partner to hold a 4 card major and 5-5 is much more likely than a 6-5 hand. However, 2♠ followed by 3♥ lets partner know that you have a fit for both of his suits.
As for the Diamond ruffs: If partner has a stiff Diamond the a Diamond lead seems very likely. Not sure whether partner would lead a Diamond off a 5=5=2=1 hand. (Indeed, a case could be made that IF you think that Diamond ruffs are necessary to set this contract, a 3♦ might be called for)
#5
Posted 2009-September-27, 20:14
#6
Posted 2009-September-27, 23:56
#7
Posted 2009-September-28, 02:01
Since you lost by two IMPs, it can't possibly be for +110 for 3♣= at one table and 3♥ -1 at the other. Ergo, the likely score was +140 at one table and +110 at the other, which indicates that I should bid 3♥
Of course another possibility is that one major suit strain makes and the other doesn't...
#8
Posted 2009-September-28, 02:48
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#9
Posted 2009-September-28, 03:23
Maybe partner leads his singelton diamond if he has one, maybe we beat it by force and maybe we just avoid -500 if one major is 4/1.
Two more dettails had been of interest: If you had bid 2 Diamond instead of 2 Heart, what had this shown?
If rho had doubled 2 Club, what had this shown?
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#10
Posted 2009-September-28, 04:24
#11
Posted 2009-September-28, 04:59
I am used to play Michaels as 5-4, even at all vul., so
there is no gurantee for me, that we have a double fit.
So I am just following the Law.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)

Help
