These aren't actual hands, I'm just curious what people would do with them.
♠xxxx
♥Jxxx
♦AKQJ
♣K
14 HCP... Do you open? If you do, I assume 1♦... How do you respond to 1NT? How do you respond to 2NT?
♠xxxxxx
♥Qx
♦KQJ
♣AK
15HCP, all in short suits... Do you open? Assuming one opens 1♠, how does one respond to 2♥? Just say 2NT and pray you don't lose a gajillion spades?
Page 1 of 1
weird hands
#2
Posted 2009-September-20, 04:05
#1 1D, pass over 1NT.
Is game possible? No, we will have at most 24HCP together.
Why should I bid on?
#2 1S, followed by 2S.
Depends a littel bit on the the meaning of 2NT, does 2NT show
12-14 or more, but you have a 6 carder, so why not rebidding
the suit, especially if 2NT would show a slightly weaker hand,
and 2S not necesarrily promising a 6 carder.
Bridge is a easy game most of the time.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Is game possible? No, we will have at most 24HCP together.
Why should I bid on?
#2 1S, followed by 2S.
Depends a littel bit on the the meaning of 2NT, does 2NT show
12-14 or more, but you have a 6 carder, so why not rebidding
the suit, especially if 2NT would show a slightly weaker hand,
and 2S not necesarrily promising a 6 carder.
Bridge is a easy game most of the time.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#3
Posted 2009-September-20, 07:20
1. 1♦, pass 1NT, raise 2NT to game.
2. 1♠, rebid 2♠
2. 1♠, rebid 2♠
Kind regards,
Harald
Harald
#4
Posted 2009-September-21, 10:21
skaeran, on Sep 20 2009, 08:20 AM, said:
1. 1♦, pass 1NT, raise 2NT to game.
2. 1♠, rebid 2♠
2. 1♠, rebid 2♠
Agree.
Passing 1NT on hand 1 shouldn't be too awful, as partner should have at least 7 minor suit cards. And by not too awful, I mean no better or worse than most 1NT contracts.
Still decidedly intermediate - don't take my guesses as authoritative.
"gwnn" said:
rule number 1 in efficient forum reading:
hanp does not always mean literally what he writes.
hanp does not always mean literally what he writes.
Page 1 of 1

Help
