BBO Discussion Forums: Limit bid ? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Limit bid ? 2/1 System

#1 User is offline   vitorlopes 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 21
  • Joined: 2009-July-06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lisbon, Portugal
  • Interests:Astronomy, Jogging

Posted 2009-September-04, 11:57

You have:

♠AJx
♥QJx
♦Jxx
♣J109x

You are playing in MP and your partner opens 1♥ in 1st position. Which bid would you choose?

a ) 2♥ (constructive raise 8-10); or
b ) 1NT (forcing 1 round) aiming to jump in ♥ on your next turn
Science is my religion
0

#2 User is offline   andy_h 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,962
  • Joined: 2007-September-14
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.

Posted 2009-September-04, 12:07

2♥ for sure, especially in matchpoints. 4333 is bad, jacks about which is also bad and given that we are playing constructive raises I see this as an easy 2♥ bid! Although there may be attractive sides in that there are supporting honours of AJ QJ JT9 but the negative factors are just too much. If people are in 2/3♥ maybe we can outplay them.
- Andy -

We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
0

#3 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2009-September-04, 12:07

2H, even if not defined as a constructive raise.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#4 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2009-September-04, 12:29

This is not even a legitimate question. Who bids limit with that junk?
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#5 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2009-September-04, 13:38

I agree with aguahombre.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#6 User is offline   pooltuna 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,814
  • Joined: 2009-July-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Orleans

Posted 2009-September-04, 13:39

vitorlopes, on Sep 4 2009, 12:57 PM, said:

You have:

♠AJx
♥QJx
♦Jxx
♣J109x

You are playing in MP and your partner opens 1♥ in 1st position. Which bid would you choose?

a ) 2♥ (constructive raise 8-10); or
b ) 1NT (forcing 1 round) aiming to jump in ♥ on your next turn

better to use a constructive raise. The quacks are soft values and you are subject to losing 4 tricks unless partner has xtras to compensate.
"Tell me of your home world, Usul"
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"

"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."

George Bernard Shaw
0

#7 User is offline   ONEferBRID 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 835
  • Joined: 2009-May-03

Posted 2009-September-04, 15:45

2H
In terms of LTC it is at least 9, which means partner would have to hve a very big hand for game ( LTC of about 5 ).
Don Stenmark ( TWOferBRIDGE )
0

#8 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,213
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2009-September-04, 15:46

a), it could even be argued, that this is a min hand for this call.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#9 User is offline   peachy 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,056
  • Joined: 2007-November-19
  • Location:Pacific Time

Posted 2009-September-04, 20:33

c ) a regular 2H raise.
0

#10 User is offline   jdeegan 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,427
  • Joined: 2005-August-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Economics
    Finance
    Bridge bidding theory
    Cooking
    Downhill skiing

Posted 2009-September-06, 23:20

:angry: 2♥
That's a REALLY ugly 10.
0

#11 User is online   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,396
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2009-September-06, 23:54

vitorlopes, on Sep 4 2009, 12:57 PM, said:

You have:

♠AJx
♥QJx
♦Jxx
♣J109x

You are playing in MP and your partner opens 1♥ in 1st position. Which bid would you choose?

a ) 2♥ (constructive raise 8-10); or
b ) 1NT (forcing 1 round) aiming to jump in ♥ on your next turn

2h...and i play 7/8-11

please....
0

#12 User is offline   neilkaz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,568
  • Joined: 2006-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barrington IL USA
  • Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2009-September-07, 20:27

aguahombre, on Sep 4 2009, 01:07 PM, said:

2H, even if not defined as a constructive raise.

Agreed !! The duck it goes "quack quack" and no ruffing values. With 4333 be conservative.

I had this type of hand the other day, and not playing constructive and the 2♥ contract was totally hopeless.
0

#13 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2009-September-08, 20:35

2♥, that's the worst 10 points I've seen in a while
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#14 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2009-September-08, 20:53

mtvesuvius, on Sep 8 2009, 09:35 PM, said:

2♥, that's the worst 10 points I've seen in a while

u mean my ten loser hand can't promote the four jacks and the ten-nine of clubs? :)
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#15 User is offline   Tola18 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 333
  • Joined: 2006-January-19
  • Location:Sweden
  • Interests:Cats.

Posted 2009-September-13, 06:46

There are 3 extra advantages for these 2H:

1. partner can invite. IF partner invites, we can - and probably will - accept.
2. Im not revealing his hand either.
3. If partner has minimum, 2H will be enough, while 3H may be too high.


If I bid the limit-sequence and if he has some extras, he must guess. As this is almost minimum-10 pointer, his quess will probably be unhappy...
It is only if he has big extras, the adventure will surely end well.

But if he has big extras, it will also end well after 2H. Constructive or ambiqious.
Cats bring joy and a feeling of harmony and well-being into a home.
Many homeless cats seek a home.
Adopt one. Contact a cat shelter!
You too can be an everyday hero. :)
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users