BBO Discussion Forums: Trapped - now what - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Trapped - now what May be too easy for many

Poll: They "trap-pass"; What do you do? (32 member(s) have cast votes)

They "trap-pass"; What do you do?

  1. Pass (8 votes [25.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

  2. 1NT - to play (5 votes [15.62%])

    Percentage of vote: 15.62%

  3. Rdbl - SOS (16 votes [50.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 50.00%

  4. I'd bid 1NT in the 1st round (3 votes [9.38%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.38%

  5. Other (please explain) (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   shyams 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,878
  • Joined: 2009-August-02
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-August-24, 04:07

I am not sure which forum this should be in. Anyway, in 4th seat / none vul / MPs, you hold:
5
Q842
8765
AT74

The bidding starts inauspiciously as follows:
LHO Part. RHO You
1H   1S   pass  pass
Dbl pass pass ???
0

#2 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2009-August-24, 04:41

i think 1♠x will be a bad score for us. Let's try to get a better one - xx.

BTW maybe at imps it is not so clear. I think 2mx can go potentially for quite a bit more than 1Sx, so that could change the odds.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#3 User is offline   rd6789 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 98
  • Joined: 2009-August-03

Posted 2009-August-24, 04:45

XX - rho has loads of spades to pass at the 1 level
richard
0

#4 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2009-August-24, 07:49

Passing when I can recover?

It is the choice between 1 NT and XX. I prefer the first. Partner will get quite a good view of our hand (0-1 spade, around 5-6 HCPs, some hearts with an honour), so if we belong in 2 of a minor he can bid it.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#5 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2009-August-24, 08:05

1NT is better than redouble. Clearly, I have spade shortness for my call, otherwise I would pass. But I am not broke (which might be expected on this auction) and the 1NT bid should show that I have some values.

If partner wants to pull 1NT to 2 of a minor, that is fine. But I am not going to demand that he do so by redoubling. Redouble will almost always prevent us from playing what may be our best contract - 1NT.
0

#6 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2009-August-24, 09:16

Yep, that is about typical of what happens to me when I mess around. 1NT would now sound too "unusual" to Partner, so I guess XX as slightly better than having made my bed and then lying in it with a pass.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#7 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2009-August-24, 09:48

I always run from a doubled 1-level contract if it's at all probable that we'll do better in some other spot.

I prefer 1NT to xx here, for reasons already mentioned upthread.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#8 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,094
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2009-August-24, 10:34

Running looks clear to me, but I prefer xx.

1N will not get partner to bid a 4 card minor, and rates to play poorly unless partner can contribute something to the heart suit. If that is the the case, he might be able to bid 1N himself.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#9 User is offline   nigel_k 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,207
  • Joined: 2009-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2009-August-24, 14:01

XX.

I think this is the wrong hand for 1NT. I'd be surprised if 1NT plays better than 2 of a minor (unless partner bids 1NT himself) and he may well pass expecting more in hearts and less in the minor suits.
0

#10 User is offline   Echognome 

  • Deipnosophist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,386
  • Joined: 2005-March-22

Posted 2009-August-24, 14:08

I'm passing. Of course running could be right, but we're going to be a level higher.
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
0

#11 User is offline   H_KARLUK 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 973
  • Joined: 2006-March-17
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2009-August-24, 14:11

Pass. Anything possible anytime.

I don't want to promise a rose garden. Sometimes the correct bidding is by no means obvious. A counterbalance by a defensive error mostly possible, so that the par result could easily achieve in spite of the worst efforts of both sides.
We all know that light travels faster than sound. That's why certain people appear bright until you hear them speak. Quoted by Albert Einstein.
0

#12 User is offline   Double ! 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,291
  • Joined: 2004-August-04
  • Location:Work in the South Bronx, NYC, USA
  • Interests:My personal interests are my family and my friends. I am extremely concerned about the lives and futures of the kids (and their families) that I work with. I care about the friends I have made on BBO. Also, I am extremely concerned about the environment/ ecology/ wildlife/ the little planet that we call Earth. How much more of the world's habitat and food supply for animals do we plan on destroying. How many more wetlands are we going to drain, fill, and build on? How many more sand dunes are we going to knock down in the interests of high-rise hotels or luxury homes?

Posted 2009-August-24, 15:04

Decades ago, Terrence Reese presented a similar problem hand in his book titled (then) "Develop Your Bidding Judgment". (It was then re-issued under a different name.) He recommended XX with comments about the possibility that partner could have enough to make the contract in his hand and that the XX catered for that possibility. Any other bid (except pass) would take partner out of the decision-making process.

DHL
"That's my story, and I'm sticking to it!"
0

#13 User is offline   shyams 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,878
  • Joined: 2009-August-02
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-August-25, 04:52

Scoring: MP

The actual hand is above. We played in 1NTx by South. Most Wests did not open the bidding, so the actual result on the board may be irrelevant. Some points / follow-ups:

1. Before I posted the hand, I thought the only logical action for South was XX. But many of you said 1NT embeds an option to partner to remove.
1a. Should North take-out to 2D after 1NT is doubled by East?
1b. Would North not expect South to have 5 clubs & 1 spade (after all 1C can be 3-cards)? In such a case, North still risks playing in a 4-3 fit.

2. I thought XX is better than 1NT also due to reasons listed by DHL. Occasionally (rarely) partner may choose to play and may even make it (or at worst be -1 when opps have game)

3. Some of you chose pass. Isn't "do something" a winning strategy in the long run?

Thank you all for the responses.
0

#14 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-August-25, 05:40

shyams, on Aug 24 2009, 11:07 AM, said:

LHO Part. RHO You
1H   1S   pass  pass
Dbl pass pass ???

Did you give us the right auction?
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#15 User is offline   shyams 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,878
  • Joined: 2009-August-02
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-August-25, 05:56

gnasher, on Aug 25 2009, 12:40 PM, said:

shyams, on Aug 24 2009, 11:07 AM, said:

LHO Part. RHO You
1H   1S   pass  pass
Dbl pass pass ???

Did you give us the right auction?

Oh, no! Terribly sorry. I feel stupid for not noticing the blunder despite having looked at the post at least 5 times! :unsure:

The typo in my first post renders is a major flaw. The opening bid was 1C :( My mistake, don't know how I never noticed it at all :(

I apologize to all. Oh, no!
0

#16 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2009-August-25, 07:35

So the auction was
1♣ 1 ♠ pass pass
X pass pass 1 NT
pass pass X pass
pass pass?

It is tricky, but I think North should redouble here for SOS. He has tolerance for both red suits and knows from just around 16 HCPS between him and partner. But 1 NT X -1 is the best result possible, well done anyway.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users