Wtp? 5404 9-count
#21
Posted 2009-August-25, 18:18
#22
Posted 2009-August-25, 19:24
MickyB, on Aug 25 2009, 06:19 AM, said:
|
| RHO opens 1♦. Do you bid 1♠ or dbl? |
The old standards to go by is that you need 11pts to double in Direct seat for a takeout double that your partner can respond in a suit at the one level so.....1s for me....
If you prefer double here, npp.
#23
Posted 2009-August-25, 19:41
mike777, on Aug 26 2009, 01:24 PM, said:
MickyB, on Aug 25 2009, 06:19 AM, said:
|
| RHO opens 1♦. Do you bid 1♠ or dbl? |
The old standards to go by is that you need 11pts to double in Direct seat for a takeout double that your partner can respond in a suit at the one level so.....1s for me....
This isn't a bad standard however at all levels the presence of a void creates addtional licence to act a little lighter.
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#24
Posted 2009-August-25, 20:47
#25
Posted 2009-August-25, 23:12
nigel_k, on Aug 25 2009, 04:00 PM, said:
heh, funny I feel the same way.
#27
Posted 2009-August-26, 09:35
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#28
Posted 2009-August-26, 10:21
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#29
Posted 2009-August-26, 10:28
#30
Posted 2009-August-26, 10:31
kfay, on Aug 26 2009, 11:28 AM, said:
While people who double directly are not?
#31
Posted 2009-August-26, 10:35
mich-b, on Aug 26 2009, 11:31 AM, said:
kfay, on Aug 26 2009, 11:28 AM, said:
While people who double directly are not?
I'm not sure what you're saying.
BW Standard stipulates a t/o double of 1C as " ♠A x x x ♥A x x x ♦Q x x x ♣x
is a minimum takeout double of one club with neither side vulnerable."
Everyone knows that with good shape you don't need an opening hand. I really don't see what your argument is. Maybe you think this hand is worse than that hand and the vulnerability makes a difference. Personally I think this hand is a better hand and the vulnerability doesn't mean a whole lot to me.
#32
Posted 2009-August-26, 10:41
mich-b, on Aug 26 2009, 05:31 PM, said:
kfay, on Aug 26 2009, 11:28 AM, said:
While people who double directly are not?
Correct.
#33
Posted 2009-August-26, 10:51
The auction proceeded
1♦-X-1♥-2♥
3♣-3♥-5♦-X
all pass
What would you lead?
#34
Posted 2009-August-26, 11:03
#35
Posted 2009-August-26, 12:31
MickyB, on Aug 26 2009, 11:51 AM, said:
The auction proceeded
1♦-X-1♥-2♥
3♣-3♥-5♦-X
all pass
What would you lead?
Please explain the auction to me. My LHO's 1♥ bid was natural, correct?
What does my partner's 2♥ bid mean?
The answer to my previous question may answer this one, but what does my 3♥ bid show?
#36
Posted 2009-August-26, 12:36
ArtK78, on Aug 26 2009, 01:31 PM, said:
MickyB, on Aug 26 2009, 11:51 AM, said:
The auction proceeded
1♦-X-1♥-2♥
3♣-3♥-5♦-X
all pass
What would you lead?
Please explain the auction to me. My LHO's 1♥ bid was natural, correct?
What does my partner's 2♥ bid mean?
The answer to my previous question may answer this one, but what does my 3♥ bid show?
lol
#38
Posted 2009-August-26, 13:29
ArtK78, on Aug 26 2009, 07:31 PM, said:
Our double of 1♦ was for takeout. The other ten calls were natural.
#39
Posted 2009-August-26, 13:32
matmat, on Aug 27 2009, 07:17 AM, said:
Jlall, on Aug 26 2009, 01:36 PM, said:
shift key broken?
lol
loL
lOl
lOL
Lol
LoL
LOl
LOL
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#40
Posted 2009-August-26, 18:25

Help
