Let partner out?
#1
Posted 2009-August-10, 17:06
w/w imps you are 2nd seat.
P P 1D 2C
p 2D p 2H
p ?
What do you bid? If you bid 2S partner bids 3C, what do you over that? First time partnership but your partner is known as an aggressive player.
#2
Posted 2009-August-10, 17:21
I bid 2♠, then bid 3♦ over 3♣. If partner bids anything except 3NT, I bid 4♣.
#3
Posted 2009-August-10, 18:52
Echognome, on Aug 11 2009, 12:21 AM, said:
Agree with this, except I would drag partner to 5C not 4
#4
Posted 2009-August-10, 19:10
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#5
Posted 2009-August-10, 23:56
3H 5C - If partner is shapely 5c must have play.
3S 4C - Expecting partner to pass with 2 losing diamonds but to usually bid game with a stiff diamond.
3NT P
4C P
#6
Posted 2009-August-11, 00:16
I plan on passing 3C when he bids it over 2S unless my 2D and 2S bids have created a situation (by agreement or by some expert standard that I don't know about) that I promise to act one more time over 3C, but I don't think such promises can apply for a passed hand. I'm not too confident about my choice but it is a non-vul game, if we miss it I'll have to hope we beat them in other hands
#7
Posted 2009-August-11, 02:38
#8
Posted 2009-August-11, 03:35
#9
Posted 2009-August-11, 04:46
#10
Posted 2009-August-11, 08:20
Jlall, on Aug 10 2009, 06:06 PM, said:
w/w imps you are 2nd seat.
P P 1D 2C
p 2D p 2H
p ?
What do you bid? If you bid 2S partner bids 3C, what do you over that? First time partnership but your partner is known as an aggressive player.
yeah I bid 2♠ and at these colors the rewards are not sufficiently enticing so I pass 3♣
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#11
Posted 2009-August-11, 08:44
Jlall, on Aug 10 2009, 06:06 PM, said:
w/w imps you are 2nd seat.
P P 1D 2C
p 2D p 2H
p ?
What do you bid? If you bid 2S partner bids 3C, what do you over that? First time partnership but your partner is known as an aggressive player.
I don't think 2♦ has necessarily promised club support, so it seems wrong to just leave partner in 3♣ over 2♠ when we're looking at QJTxx in his suit. 5♣ could easily be on: give partner the perfecto of: x Axxx xx AKxxxx.
I'm bidding 2♠ followed by 4♣ over 3♣ (and hoping we don't have 3 diamond losers and a major suit loser).
#12
Posted 2009-August-11, 09:23
Seriously, though, I will eventually stop torturing partner at 4C.
#13
Posted 2009-August-11, 09:45
Free, on Aug 11 2009, 04:35 AM, said:
Great post thanks.
#14
Posted 2009-August-11, 10:20
Edit: I forgot to mention the main reason why partner is likely to have 5 clubs only - the opponents are silent with almost 20 hcp, seems unlikely that they both have club shortness. Of course, if your partner would often overcall 1♥ with 2425 shape and good hearts, then bidding on gets more interesting.
#15
Posted 2009-August-11, 11:23
Jlall, on Aug 11 2009, 04:45 PM, said:
Free, on Aug 11 2009, 04:35 AM, said:
Great post thanks.
Ok, so partner bids 3♣ (obviously I didn't read that far JLOLLY - thanks for pointing that out to me)... 3♦ now
#16
Posted 2009-August-11, 13:25
Anyways, as cherdano said partner is very unlikely to have a min 4-6 since the opps quit bidding! Missed this at the table. Oh well. Partner had Qx Kxxx xx AK9xx. 3C was the limit.
#17
Posted 2009-August-11, 16:24
Jlall, on Aug 10 2009, 06:06 PM, said:
P P 1D 2C
p 2D p 2H
p ?
What do you bid? If you bid 2S partner bids 3C, what do you over that? First time partnership but your partner is known as an aggressive player.
- Over partner's 2♥, I would have preferred 3♦ to 2♠.
- Now (after partner's 3♣) I would bid 3♠ rather than Pass.
#18
Posted 2009-August-12, 02:34
A more simple-minded reason to suspect partner has only 5 clubs is that the six card suit is 6 times less likely to be dealt (though against that a six card overcall is much more likely to be acceptable without both top honors).
EDIT-- AKxxx is 4 times more frequent than AKxxxx and 2.8 times more frequent than AYxxxx where Y can be either K or x. Allowing for the pro-rate chance to lose a trick to the K when overcaller has Axxxxx, the relevant operational ratio is somewhere in between. Why do I bother with these calculations?
#19
Posted 2009-August-12, 02:47
George Carlin

Help
