is X really 12.5% superior to 5♣? I think your points are unreliable.
Do you act?
#21
Posted 2009-August-11, 23:48
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#22
Posted 2009-August-12, 10:30
gwnn, on Aug 12 2009, 12:48 AM, said:
is X really 12.5% superior to 5♣? I think your points are unreliable.
When I pose a bidding problem, I like respondents to list some of the alternatives they consider and subjectively estimate their relative merits. I find this helpful because, usually, I'm aware that I made the wrong call, but wonder how egregious was my error.
I realize that _X would not be most people's choice; but I play that
- 5♣ just shows long ♣.
- _X followed by a ♣ bid shows high cards as well as long ♣
-
Less pre-emptive. -
More constructive.
-
-
But I prefer 2♣ to _X because I don't fancy defending 1♥ X

Help
