BBO Discussion Forums: Suit combi % calculation - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Suit combi % calculation

#1 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,473
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2009-July-26, 03:14

Working on suit combinations. Can you verify below logic, Is it 100% correct and complete?:
 
AK9x
vs
Qx
 
You first play the Q and East drops the J.
Following relevant possibilities:
East has:
1) J     0.48%
2) JT   0,73% => Divide by 2 because of restricted choice: 0,365%
3) JTx 4,44% (Falsecard) => Divide by 2 because of restricted choice: 2,22%
 
==> 0,48% for finesse vs 2,585% for Drop.
...But if East is not a strong player and will never falsecard then:
==> 0,48% for finesse vs 0,365% for Drop
...But if East is not a strong player and will never falsecard with JTx but always play the J from JT then:
==> 0,48% for finesse vs 0,73% for Drop
 
Thanks,
Koen
Bridge Single Dummy Program: https://github.com/k...eDummy/releases
0

#2 User is offline   se12sam 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 184
  • Joined: 2009-March-22

Posted 2009-July-26, 03:19

I may be wrong (it's been a while since I was in college) but I think the division by 2 on 3) is incorrect. Restricted choice principle applies ONLY when there is no choice. A false-card from JTx etc is a choice and the "sighting" of the J does not reduce the probabilities from 4.44% to 2.22%.
0

#3 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,473
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2009-July-26, 03:22

se12sam, on Jul 26 2009, 11:19 AM, said:

I may be wrong (it's been a while since I was in college) but I think the division by 2 on 3) is incorrect. Restricted choice principle applies ONLY when there is no choice. A false-card from JTx etc is a choice and the "sighting" of the J does not reduce the probabilities from 4.44% to 2.22%.

I thought that if East has JTx and wants to falsecard he will 50% of the time play the J and 50% the T. Therefor 4.44/2
Bridge Single Dummy Program: https://github.com/k...eDummy/releases
0

#4 User is offline   benlessard 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,465
  • Joined: 2006-January-07
  • Location:Montreal Canada
  • Interests:All games. i really mean all of them.

Posted 2009-July-26, 11:32

your initial calculation are correct. If East is a robot that never falsecard from JTx finesse. If he always play the J from JT its slightly better to play for the drop.


If he know you have Qx the hes got a mandatory falsecard with JTx. Therefore playing for the drop is way better. If its possible you got Qxx then its still possible for him to play the J from Jx or from JTx but both are dangerous. If the position is



Not only you would usually cash the A or K first but he still can play the J or T (from JTx or Hx) with a small risk. the 2nd round he will play the low card and you will have a guess. (Should finesse) and lose.
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users