1- i wouldnt overcall.
2- i think 1Nt is a clear mistake. Not strong enough and the hand could easily play better elsewhere.
3- I would put you down -3 for -800 (all you have to do is give count in clubs so that north can hold up in clubs)
dull partscore decision
#21
Posted 2009-July-16, 10:07
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#22
Posted 2009-July-16, 20:29
A 1H overcall is totally obvious. I can't believe anyone would pass.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
#23
Posted 2009-July-16, 20:46
Eh, bridge is about risk. Sometimes you get stung. Often, -800 scores against air result in a push.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
#24
Posted 2009-July-17, 02:13
benlessard, on Jul 16 2009, 05:07 PM, said:
I would put you down -3 for -800 (all you have to do is give count in clubs so that north can hold up in clubs)
After taking three spades, three diamonds and two clubs, one of the defenders is on lead. Which suit would you like them to play?
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#25
Posted 2009-July-17, 04:06
The_Hog, on Jul 17 2009, 04:29 AM, said:
A 1H overcall is totally obvious. I can't believe anyone would pass.
Agree.
Kind regards,
Harald
Harald
#26
Posted 2009-July-19, 08:45
Quote
After taking three spades, three diamonds and two clubs, one of the defenders is on lead. Which suit would you like them to play?
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#27
Posted 2009-July-19, 11:05
Having bid 1NT, after my RHO doubled I would bid 2♥. On the actual hand this looks like -1, or, more likely, the opponents playing 2♠.
And everyone would overcall 1♥ at the table, saying anything else is resulting.
And everyone would overcall 1♥ at the table, saying anything else is resulting.
"It is not enough to be a good player. You must also play well." -- Tarrasch
#28
Posted 2009-July-20, 01:47
benlessard, on Jul 19 2009, 03:45 PM, said:
You have to finesse clubs at trick 2 wich is a bit double-dummy.
How would you suggest that declarer play it?
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn

Help
