take that, global warming
#1
Posted 2009-June-23, 13:34
#3
Posted 2009-June-23, 14:34
Peak activity is expected to start around 2012......doh!
#4
Posted 2009-June-23, 16:59
Quote
Hope it's not December...
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#5
Posted 2009-June-23, 17:06
#6
Posted 2009-June-23, 18:07
p.s. Delay your major electronics purchases from the start of 2012
#7
Posted 2009-June-23, 18:17
Al_U_Card, on Jun 23 2009, 07:07 PM, said:
p.s. Delay your major electronics purchases from the start of 2012
Is this one of them Y2K kinda thingumees?
Call me Desdinova...Eternal Light
C. It's the nexus of the crisis and the origin of storms.
IV: ace 333: pot should be game, idk
e: "Maybe God remembered how cute you were as a carrot."
#8
Posted 2009-June-24, 05:15
For the last 50 years or so, the earth's magnetic field has started to "reverse". This "pole shift" has nothing to do with "crustal slips" but lots to do with the magnetosphere and incoming radiation from the sun.
Instead of one, nice, magnetic field around the earth (protecting it from ionized particles from the sun) the field is degrading and getting spotty. It may take another 50 to 500 years to complete the "reversal" but when it is over, Magnetic North on the compass will point towards Geographic South.
There is a decent report and video at PBS
http://www.pbs.org/w...etic/about.html
During the transition, the downside is that incoming solar flares and CME's get a "straight shot" at us. Like the CME's in 1859 and 1921, they wrought havoc with the electrical devices of the day.
Today's electronic world is a whole 'nother smoke.
#9
Posted 2009-June-24, 09:23
#10
Posted 2009-June-24, 10:08
#11
Posted 2009-June-24, 10:14
No, we cannot have a sunspot on Earth. Sunspots are not dark, they are just less hot than the surrounding area.
This is all complicated by the fact that the Sun does not have a surface, instead we see all the photons that have been emitted in an area where the density is just right that the photons can get through without being scattered again.
#12
Posted 2009-June-24, 10:49
Oct 2006: Mission impossible
Soon: Mission illegal
#13
Posted 2009-June-24, 11:26
Some command and control, however, are not and rely on ELF antennae for signals to pass through extreme interference.
Your TV, ipod, non-military satellites are definitely not, however.
#14
Posted 2009-June-25, 11:14
Gerben42, on Jun 24 2009, 06:23 PM, said:
Hi Gerben
Not sure whether or not your question was serious.
The Onion is a satire site. its often well worth reading, but should never be taken remotely seriously. (Just ran into the following which you might appreciate)
Twitter Creator On Iran: 'I Never Intended For Twitter To Be Useful'
SAN FRANCISCOCreator Jack Dorsey was shocked and saddened this week after learning that his social networking device, Twitter, was being used to disseminate pertinent and timely information during the recent civil unrest in Iran. "Twitter was intended to be a way for vacant, self-absorbed egotists to share their most banal and idiotic thoughts with anyone pathetic enough to read them," said a visibly confused Dorsey, claiming that Twitter is at its most powerful when it makes an already attention-starved populace even more needy for constant affirmation. "When I heard how Iranians were using my beloved creation for their own meanssuch as organizing a political movement and informing the outside world of the actions of a repressive regimeI couldn't believe they'd ruined something so beautiful, simple, and absolutely pointless." Dorsey said he is already working on a new website that will be so mind-numbingly useless that Iranians will not even be able to figure out how to operate it.
#15
Posted 2009-June-25, 18:34
Gerben42, on Jun 24 2009, 11:23 AM, said:
I suggest you read a few more articles there, you might get the picture.

Help
