BBO Discussion Forums: stayman? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

stayman? what meant my partner

#1 User is offline   pippo13 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 18
  • Joined: 2007-September-08

Posted 2009-June-25, 02:25

Scoring: IMP

I was sitting South. The bid went: E=pass / S=1NT / W=2 / N=2NT / E= 3 / S= 3NT / W=pass / N=4 / pass pass pass.
I bid 3NT because I thought my partner had a stop in spades, no 4-card majors and probably stops elsewhere.
We had no particular agreements.
My partner objected, saying that 2NT was an interrogative about minors, and that it is a very usual bid.
My questions:
1) Is that so?
2) Even if it is so, wasn't it better for north to bid 3 after West's 2?
0

#2 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2009-June-25, 03:55

1. Without prior discussion for B/Is 2 NT is natural and invitational.

With discussion this could be better used as scrambling or Lebensohl. Opposite an unknown expert I would always assume Lebensohl.

3. 3 HEart had been good as long as it had been forcing. I do not know what standard is, so I had doubled and bid Hearts to show a forcing hand with hearts.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#3 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,401
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2009-June-25, 04:07

3 would be forcing for most people and I see no reason to bid 2NT with the North hand, no matter what he thought it meant.

I don't like Codo(Roland)'s idea of doubling with the North hand. Even if it is take out (which not everybody plays), you shouldn't double with a void in spades as opener may pass with four spades.

If playing negative doubles, dbl followed by 3 would be nonforcing. Of course you can play it the other way round but I certainly wouldn't assume that with an unknown partner.

If I was afraid that 3 was nonforcing I would bid 4 with the north hand.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#4 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2009-June-25, 04:27

Your partner is not correct. 2NT is usually played as lebensohl. I don't hink this is beyond a Beginner/Intermediate. Anyway, 3H would be forcing and that is what your partner should have bid. I take it you made 6?
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#5 User is offline   andy_h 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,962
  • Joined: 2007-September-14
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.

Posted 2009-June-25, 04:29

Agree with helene
- Andy -

We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
0

#6 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2009-June-25, 05:18

So always willing to learn:

He should have bid 3 as obviously all know that this is forcing.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#7 User is offline   neilkaz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,568
  • Joined: 2006-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barrington IL USA
  • Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2009-June-25, 18:28

PD should just bid a GF 3 here, just like us oldtimers did in ancient times before transfers if there had been no overcall.
0

#8 User is offline   neilkaz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,568
  • Joined: 2006-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barrington IL USA
  • Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2009-June-25, 18:37

The_Hog, on Jun 25 2009, 05:27 AM, said:

Your partner is not correct. 2NT is usually played as lebensohl. I don't hink this is beyond a Beginner/Intermediate. Anyway, 3H would be forcing and that is what your partner should have bid. I take it you made 6?

Simple lebensohl is not to difficult for B/I. From my experience, what confuses them is remembering the concepts of whether fast or slow actions slow stoppers, however.
0

#9 User is offline   vuroth 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,459
  • Joined: 2007-June-03
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2009-June-27, 09:04

neilkaz, on Jun 25 2009, 07:37 PM, said:

The_Hog, on Jun 25 2009, 05:27 AM, said:

Your partner is not correct. 2NT is usually played as lebensohl. I don't hink this is beyond a Beginner/Intermediate. Anyway, 3H would be forcing and that is what your partner should have bid. I take it you made 6?

Simple lebensohl is not to difficult for B/I. From my experience, what confuses them is remembering the concepts of whether fast or slow actions slow stoppers, however.

Lebensohl isn't beyond B/I. This B/I, though, has many other things to nail down before I add one optional convention to my game.

B)

V
Still decidedly intermediate - don't take my guesses as authoritative.

"gwnn" said:

rule number 1 in efficient forum reading:
hanp does not always mean literally what he writes.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users