gnasher, on Jun 5 2009, 04:00 AM, said:
H_KARLUK, on Jun 5 2009, 04:06 AM, said:
I am topic starter. I do not want you in my topics. I never commented your topics.
They're not
your topics. When you post something on a public forum, it belongs to the public.
We disagree. It's topic starter's "corner".
It's a matter of maturity. No need childish emotional subjective appeals.
I am ok when everybody publish their ideas about "self technical analyses".
I am against loaded questions, prejudices, personal conflicts, halftruths, demonization, mischaracterization, scapegoating.
Is it really hard not to criticize in a harsh way about another post? I know that very old method : You are with us or not. Neutrals disallowed.
My way is different : Let readers decide which opinion good for them.
Meanwhile does that person unable to defend his ideas and you advocate for him ?
Where do I attend ? To a cyber open multi wrestling show or to a serious bridge forum ?
As a resume behave on forums like at bridge tables "no to gloating, sarcasm" !
You should better think again : Would you like to visit a place that you are not wanted there ?
I assume you will agree that attitudes determine altitudes.