Is it WTP ?
Swan over 3H. imps
#1
Posted 2009-June-02, 20:14
Is it WTP ?
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#3
Posted 2009-June-02, 20:40
#6
Posted 2009-June-03, 00:20
mich-b, on Jun 3 2009, 03:16 PM, said:
Where are all the non-leaping-Michaels fans?
They treat their hand as 5116 and bid 4 ♣
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#7
Posted 2009-June-03, 00:21
mich-b, on Jun 3 2009, 01:16 AM, said:
Where are all the non-leaping-Michaels fans?
Right here! I guess I have to admit it. And yeah, I'll bid 4♣ anyway and pray. If partner bids 4♠ and gets doubled I'll pull.
#8
Posted 2009-June-03, 00:39
I wouldn't bid 4C NLM Josh. This is forcing and I think 5C will be right more often than 4S on the hands where partner bids 4S. Partner will always be bidding spades with equal length.
#9
Posted 2009-June-03, 00:46
mich-b, on Jun 3 2009, 08:16 AM, said:
Where are all the non-leaping-Michaels fans?
Right here, not at the table holding this awkward hand.
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
#10
Posted 2009-June-03, 05:05
#11
Posted 2009-June-03, 08:40
The only time X will backfired is if partner jump to 5D/6D or if 5C is way better than 3NT.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#12
Posted 2009-June-03, 08:53
benlessard, on Jun 3 2009, 09:40 AM, said:
The only time X will backfired is if partner jump to 5D/6D or if 5C is way better than 3NT.
5C. The thought of passing 3NT after we make a takeout double is quite painful...
#13
Posted 2009-June-03, 08:58
benlessard, on Jun 3 2009, 03:40 PM, said:
The only time X will backfired is if partner jump to 5D/6D or if 5C is way better than 3NT.
Are you planning to let partner play in spades?
#14
Posted 2009-June-03, 10:31
Quote
I think 3Nt will be slighty better than 5C in the long run.
Quote
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#15
Posted 2009-June-03, 10:48
hanp, on Jun 3 2009, 01:39 AM, said:
I wouldn't bid 4C NLM Josh. This is forcing and I think 5C will be right more often than 4S on the hands where partner bids 4S. Partner will always be bidding spades with equal length.
Even if 4♠ is right 1/3 of the time, they only have to save me by doubling me 1/4 of the rest of the time (1/3 + [1/4 * 2/3]) = 50%) for me to reach the better suit half the time by starting with 4♣. So in practice I'm not convinced bidding 5♣ is better.
Well in hindsight they could also double me when 4♠ is right too. Ok I just don't know what's best.
#16
Posted 2009-June-03, 13:21
After a S preempt however 4H is to play and 4D is better played as a slam try than a pick a game.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."

Help
