mikeh, on May 25 2009, 05:17 PM, said:
In my partnership with Ken Rexford, I would bid 4♠ as 5 Ace Exclusion Keycard.... looking for the Diamond A and any of the A/Ks of the two suits we've bid... and, of course, he responds 5♥ to show 2 keycards and one relevant Queen.
I then bid 6♠ to tell him that we have 13 top tricks in either clubs or hearts, but he is to bid clubs when in doubt (I can correct in the remote chance that I want Ken to get his hands on dummy).... and to invite, via this empathetic advanced Western Cue, the master bid of 7N.
Ken and I are collaborating on a book that focusses upon such everyday, mundane hands. Subscribe early... deposits are encouraged to ensure YOUR copy, signed by both of us in invisible ink.
Edit: For those who prefer less scientific methods, i commend gnasher's pleasingly old-fashioned approach... natural bidding.... quaint.
Just to clarify for those who want to know more about the Mike-Ken System...
4
♣ would have of course been natural; 4
♦ would have been a strong heart bid. Hence, 4
♠ is unnecessary except as Exclusion. And, with Responder asking, of course the club King should be shown. Like Mike said, very normal stuff so far.
Now, arguably the default here is that Opener should only show the heart Queen, but Mike is essentially right that the response, either way, is 5
♥. Again, very practical.
I think, however, Mike missed a step. Might as well bid 5
♠. This allows an interesting bid that Mike missed. Opener can bid 5NT to show the spade Ace. Responder jnow can bid 6
♦ to inquire about the diamond King, find out he has it (Opener bidding a careful 6NT) and count his tricks -- 6 clubs, 4 hearts, 2 diamonds, and one spade.
6
♠, instead, also works, but it is too esoteric. The straight line of 5
♠ works just as well, so go for the easier bid for partner, I say.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.