(1x)-dbl-p-2y, y>x
I'd like this to show 5 cards. Is there some structure out there that can accommodate this?
Page 1 of 1
jump advance
#2
Posted 2009-May-27, 09:52
I play very heavy one-level responses:
(1x) DBL (Pass) 1y up to 9(10) HCP with only four cards (can be very weak with 5+-cards)
(1x) DBL (Pass) 2y 5+ cards 6-9 HCP
After a 1-level response we raise very freely to the two-level with 4-card support and then advancer can invite game with a good maximum.
Otherwise if 2y is to be five then with four and traditional values for jumping you need either to bid more heavily at the one level or cue-bid more freely or some combination of these two.
(1x) DBL (Pass) 1y up to 9(10) HCP with only four cards (can be very weak with 5+-cards)
(1x) DBL (Pass) 2y 5+ cards 6-9 HCP
After a 1-level response we raise very freely to the two-level with 4-card support and then advancer can invite game with a good maximum.
Otherwise if 2y is to be five then with four and traditional values for jumping you need either to bid more heavily at the one level or cue-bid more freely or some combination of these two.
Wayne Burrows
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#4
Posted 2009-May-27, 16:48
Second Herbert neg's. When I played them a lot, the jump showed a positive with five cards, "positive" meaning about 5-6 useful HCP or so.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
#5
Posted 2009-May-27, 20:37
I think any "fix" is worse than the "problem."
New website: http://www.justinlall.com
#6
Posted 2009-May-27, 23:50
I prefer to stay away from offshapes doubles and make 4 card overcall. Matter of style i guess. Bidding at the 1 level with 9 pts because you have a 4 card suit is just putting too much pressure on the doubler.
I like to play that
(1C)----X-----(P)------1S
(2C)----2S
2S may show slight extras with 4 trumps
but
(1C)----X-----(P)-------1S
(P)------2S
show the real stuff.
I agree 100% with JLOL.
I like to play that
(1C)----X-----(P)------1S
(2C)----2S
2S may show slight extras with 4 trumps
but
(1C)----X-----(P)-------1S
(P)------2S
show the real stuff.
I agree 100% with JLOL.
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#7
Posted 2009-May-28, 00:51
Many Polish players play that after 1♣ Dbl Pass, responses are similar to after we have opened 1♣, i.e. 1♦ can be a negative. In this context, jumps can show 5 cards.
Not in any other situation, though.
Not in any other situation, though.
#8
Posted 2009-May-28, 01:54
gwnn, on May 27 2009, 10:04 AM, said:
(1x)-dbl-p-2y, y>x
I'd like this to show 5 cards. Is there some structure out there that can accommodate this?
I'd like this to show 5 cards. Is there some structure out there that can accommodate this?
You could play that the single jump shows 4 cards and use the double jump to show 5.
Gabor Szots
Szentendre, Hungary
Szentendre, Hungary
#9
Posted 2009-May-28, 02:32
Here's an idea.
With 5 cards you bid:
simple bid = 0-4
jump = 5-7
dbl jump = 8-10
game jump = 11-14
With 4 cards you bid:
simple bid = 0-7
cue + 2M = 8-10, non forcing
cue + 3M = 11-14, forcing
jump cue = 44 majors, 8-10
This scheme has a problem only if it goes
(1m) dbl (pass) 2m
(pass) 2♠
and now you have 4 hearts and 8-10. You'd have to bid 2NT here, which may be too high. (Passing 2♠ with 3 spades would only solve part of the problem and would create others.)
With 5 cards you bid:
simple bid = 0-4
jump = 5-7
dbl jump = 8-10
game jump = 11-14
With 4 cards you bid:
simple bid = 0-7
cue + 2M = 8-10, non forcing
cue + 3M = 11-14, forcing
jump cue = 44 majors, 8-10
This scheme has a problem only if it goes
(1m) dbl (pass) 2m
(pass) 2♠
and now you have 4 hearts and 8-10. You'd have to bid 2NT here, which may be too high. (Passing 2♠ with 3 spades would only solve part of the problem and would create others.)
#10
Posted 2009-May-29, 11:10
I use power double with xfer responses. The lowest xfer may be bust 'joker'. The joker xfer acts just like Herbert neg. to free other xfers for 5+ useful. And joker takes no space from double on 'too big for overcall'. Worst case is ambiguous scramble to escape maximum penalty but knowing nothing is forward going.
Page 1 of 1

Help
