void
#1
Posted 2009-May-10, 10:57
KQxx
A9xxx
-
Unfav Mp's
1NT-p-2♣-x
xx-2♦-X-p
p-3♣-???
1NT was 14-16.
George Carlin
#2
Posted 2009-May-10, 11:00
#3
Posted 2009-May-10, 13:26
Pass, partner can bid his own hand. (Works better if partner didn't have 5 clubs.
Rik
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#4
Posted 2009-May-10, 14:57
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#5
Posted 2009-May-11, 01:01
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#6
Posted 2009-May-11, 01:33
#8
Posted 2009-May-14, 08:37
AQJ9
ATx
xx
A9xx
How would you have bid this pretty good slam?
George Carlin
#9
Posted 2009-May-14, 10:50
gwnn, on May 14 2009, 09:37 AM, said:
AQJ9
ATx
xx
A9xx
How would you have bid this pretty good slam?
xx? Did you have a special agreement here?
By the way I pass 3♣. We are in a forcing sequence. I don't need to bid pard's hand.
Yes I'm aware that we have extras.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#10
Posted 2009-May-14, 12:01
I don't understand why we would pass. We know what partner has (clubs), partner does not know what we have (points). Maybe it is best to play pass NF, I cannot imagine partner bidding over 3C after having redoubled 2C.
Of course, I am assuming that we are not playing with a complete beginner.
#11
Posted 2009-May-14, 12:43
gwnn, on May 14 2009, 03:37 PM, said:
1NT 2♣ (dbl)
2♠ 4♣
4♥ 4♠
5♣ 5♦
6♠
#12
Posted 2009-May-14, 12:46
gwnn, on May 14 2009, 09:37 AM, said:
AQJ9
ATx
xx
A9xx
How would you have bid this pretty good slam?
By making the normal response to Stayman. (Do I need to say that that should be 2♠?) After: 1NT-Pass-2♣-X; 2♠-Pass-4♣ we are pretty much in slam already.
Rik
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#13
Posted 2009-May-14, 12:48
hanp, on May 14 2009, 01:01 PM, said:
Yes, partner does know we have a good hand when we doubled 2♦ for penalty. While 2♣ could have been meant as garbage stayman that hand would not make any free bids later. Otherwise, all our stayman hands show at least invitational values.
#14
Posted 2009-May-14, 13:01
#15
Posted 2009-May-14, 14:18
hanp, on May 14 2009, 02:01 PM, said:
Let's start with the premise that this auction is a train wreck. Redoubling with A9xx is a joke.
Clearly we are in a forcing auction and its not because partner doubled 2♣. It's because I hit 2♦. I am not as concerned about taking 3♣ for a ride to 500 or 800 land. I'm concerned about missing slam.
If anything, I think you can make the argument (I suppose I am), that my double of 3♣ is a relatively weak action, in the framework of a forcing pass sequence.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#16
Posted 2009-May-14, 21:21
#17
Posted 2009-May-14, 21:42
gnasher, on May 15 2009, 06:43 AM, said:
gwnn, on May 14 2009, 03:37 PM, said:
1NT 3♦ - no double now
3♠ 4♣ (let them double after we have found our fit)
XX 4♦
4♥ 4♠
4NT 5♥
6♠
3♦ diamonds short clubs might have a major
4♣ spade fit and extras - please cue
XX first round control (Ace given the shortage shown and NT opening)
4♦ 1st/2nd
4♥ 1st/2nd
4NT RKCB
5♥ 2 without
6♠ Don't investigate grand since responder is limited after 4♠
With a lead directing double ...
1NT 3♦
3♠ 4♣
4♥ 4♠
5♣ 5♦
6♠
5♣ extras and ♣A
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#18
Posted 2009-May-15, 02:47

Help
