Edit: You have the ♠Q also.
Page 1 of 1
Cause good hands are so much fun
#4
Posted 2009-May-05, 02:29
Why does this merit a "LOL", with or without ♠Q? (Not that I think any posts deserve a "LOL", but that's a cultural thing.)
I'd bid 1♠. I've never overcalled at the one-level on a 20-count, but it's hard to imagine our making any game but 4♠. Pass, hoping to be able to double 1NT for penalties or 2♣ for takeout, might work, but we might also find ourselves defending 1♥ opposite ♠Jxxx and ♦Q
I'd bid 1♠. I've never overcalled at the one-level on a 20-count, but it's hard to imagine our making any game but 4♠. Pass, hoping to be able to double 1NT for penalties or 2♣ for takeout, might work, but we might also find ourselves defending 1♥ opposite ♠Jxxx and ♦Q
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#5
Posted 2009-May-05, 03:55
gnasher, on May 5 2009, 08:29 AM, said:
Why does this merit a "LOL", with or without ♠Q?
Because he's lazy and moderators are too awed to give him a spam warning
Incidently, I'll double, intending to bid 2♠ over the likely 2♣ by pard. The reason for action is we need very, very little in pard to make game. Heck,
xxxx
x
xxxx
xxxx
is probably enough.
#6
Posted 2009-May-05, 04:36
After partner has passed we rate to have fit on one of our suits. Start with 1♠ and find out.
#7
Posted 2009-May-05, 06:29
I have never overcalled on the one level with a 20 count before either... Well, maybe once before I learned about doubling and correcting... But this does look like a good situation to try it. I'm going to double however, since if partner bids clubs, maybe I should just shoot out 3NT... I will hopefully have avoided a ♣ lead, and even just the Q♠ or J♦ from partner gives me a good play at this.
The real problem is whether a 4-3♠ fit may play better... I doubt it.
The real problem is whether a 4-3♠ fit may play better... I doubt it.
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
Page 1 of 1

Help

p 1♥ to you