Prevention Double?
#1
Posted 2009-April-27, 19:30
♠ Axx
♥ QJxxx
♦ xxx
♣ xx
(1NT) - 2♠ - (3NT) - ?
1NT was 15-17
2♠ was ♠ + minor
3NT denied a ♠ stopper
Double it?
#3
Posted 2009-April-27, 22:26
#4
Posted 2009-April-27, 23:48
mtvesuvius, on Apr 28 2009, 03:30 AM, said:
Sorry, Nay.
#5
Posted 2009-April-28, 08:52
I have no reason to think pard won't lead a spade, and this looks like the field contract.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#6
Posted 2009-April-28, 16:26
#7
Posted 2009-April-28, 16:32
mtvesuvius, on Apr 28 2009, 03:26 PM, said:
LOL
#8
Posted 2009-April-28, 16:34
mtvesuvius, on Apr 28 2009, 05:26 PM, said:
Instead of a Prevention Double to stop partner saccing, I think this calls for a partner sacking to prevent this sort of thing from happening again.
#9
Posted 2009-April-28, 16:36
#10
Posted 2009-April-29, 00:29
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#11
Posted 2009-April-29, 11:19
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#12
Posted 2009-April-29, 11:33
Quote
When you double opps won't claim, they will try for an overtrick.

Help
