Page 1 of 1
Pearson?
#2
Posted 2009-April-26, 16:41
Pass. Yuck.
Who is or was Pearson, anyway? I know what his points are, and I first heard of the idea more than 20 years ago, but I don't think I heard them called Pearson Points until fairly recently.
Who is or was Pearson, anyway? I know what his points are, and I first heard of the idea more than 20 years ago, but I don't think I heard them called Pearson Points until fairly recently.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#4
Posted 2009-April-26, 17:06
Quote
Who is or was Pearson, anyway?
Pearson = Don Pearson, Los Angeles area expert, I believe "was" applies. Played with John Swanson (Soloway's Bermuda Bowl partner in 1970s).
#5
Posted 2009-April-26, 17:14
Pass
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
#6
Posted 2009-April-26, 18:22
I pass, and think that even though it's clear it wouldn't take much more to make it an opener. It has terrible spots, short spades, random queen. Really I can't think of a single reason to open other than saying you would always have opened in other seats, therefore you open. That's as bad a rule on one end as requiring 15 pearson points is on the other end. This hand has medicore offense and defense so I'm letting it go.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
#8
Posted 2009-April-26, 21:28
1H.
- Andy -
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#12
Posted 2009-April-27, 04:15
Wasn't Pearson was the guy from the "Pearson correlation coefficient"?
/nerd mode OFF
/nerd mode OFF
#13
Posted 2009-April-27, 16:44
I thought it was really, really close. It was the last hand of the evening, I took a minute and passed, and had contemplated taking another 3 minutes to see if I'd change my mind since there would be nothing else to do. Only pass-out with 9 tables (none of the 3 other hands a clear opener), I wanted to double-check if I was crazy. Pass turned out to be right double-dummy (we can make 2H, they can make 2S), and was worth 62.5% of the matchpoints. Who knows if it's right in general, switch some of the hands around and it could have easily been wrong.
So for the passers, how close is it to opening? One more jack somewhere? Two tens? Move the Q to clubs?
So for the passers, how close is it to opening? One more jack somewhere? Two tens? Move the Q to clubs?
#14
Posted 2009-April-27, 17:14
Stephen Tu, on Apr 27 2009, 05:44 PM, said:
I thought it was really, really close. It was the last hand of the evening, I took a minute and passed, and had contemplated taking another 3 minutes to see if I'd change my mind since there would be nothing else to do. Only pass-out with 9 tables (none of the 3 other hands a clear opener), I wanted to double-check if I was crazy. Pass turned out to be right double-dummy (we can make 2H, they can make 2S), and was worth 62.5% of the matchpoints. Who knows if it's right in general, switch some of the hands around and it could have easily been wrong.
So for the passers, how close is it to opening? One more jack somewhere? Two tens? Move the Q to clubs?
So for the passers, how close is it to opening? One more jack somewhere? Two tens? Move the Q to clubs?
Last hand? Get your round 12 scores and go home
The ♥J would do it and the ♥10 might.
Hi y'all!
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#15
Posted 2009-April-27, 17:50
I'd pass, but my partner opens crap (as do I) when he has spades, even in second seat.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
#16
Posted 2009-April-28, 01:29
I'd need another queen, or the diamonds and spades swapped.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#17
Posted 2009-April-28, 08:04
I would need a red suit jack or any queen, I think. Or yes, changing the shape so we don't have short spades any more.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
Page 1 of 1

Help

p-p-p-?