Opening bid?
#1
Posted 2009-April-23, 18:49
AKJTxx Ax Qx AQx
#4
Posted 2009-April-23, 22:42
#5
Posted 2009-April-23, 23:13
#6
Posted 2009-April-23, 23:16
#9
Posted 2009-April-24, 00:03
JLOL, on Apr 23 2009, 09:27 PM, said:
I would
have bet you'd open this 2N.
#10
Posted 2009-April-24, 00:16
pclayton, on Apr 24 2009, 01:03 AM, said:
JLOL, on Apr 23 2009, 09:27 PM, said:
I would
have bet you'd open this 2N.
Lol where do people come up with these reputations? And even if he were going to treat it as balanced I guarantee he would open 2♣ and call it 22-23.
#11
Posted 2009-April-24, 01:45
#13
Posted 2009-April-24, 06:36
jdonn, on Apr 24 2009, 01:16 AM, said:
pclayton, on Apr 24 2009, 01:03 AM, said:
JLOL, on Apr 23 2009, 09:27 PM, said:
I would
have bet you'd open this 2N.
Lol where do people come up with these reputations? And even if he were going to treat it as balanced I guarantee he would open 2♣ and call it 22-23.
That's where I was going with this...
2♣...2NT shows the strength right.
-P.J. Painter.
#15
Posted 2009-April-24, 08:08
If we can play 2S after a 2C opening, I would go with 2S,
but I am pretty sure, that you wont be able to stop in 2S.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#16
Posted 2009-April-24, 08:51
It worked for a strange reason; pard had ♥KT98xx (2=6=3=2). Not sure if she would have 1N'd over 1♠.
#17
Posted 2009-April-24, 11:24
pclayton, on Apr 24 2009, 09:51 AM, said:
It worked for a strange reason; pard had ♥KT98xx (2=6=3=2). Not sure if she would have 1N'd over 1♠.
Not sure what you mean it worked. Game is very close and could easily go down, and partner would be nuts not to respond with KT98xx of hearts anyway.
#18
Posted 2009-April-24, 11:44
pclayton, on Apr 24 2009, 01:03 AM, said:
JLOL, on Apr 23 2009, 09:27 PM, said:
I would
have bet you'd open this 2N.
LOL
#20
Posted 2009-April-24, 14:32

Help
