E/W playing precision so West hand limited to 15.What would you lead?
A curious bidding sequence and you are on lead against slam
#1
Posted 2009-April-05, 09:28
E/W playing precision so West hand limited to 15.What would you lead?
Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.
"Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself, but talent instantly recognizes genius".
#2
Posted 2009-April-05, 09:42
#3
Posted 2009-April-05, 09:42
-P.J. Painter.
#4
Posted 2009-April-05, 09:44
kenrexford, on Apr 5 2009, 10:42 AM, said:
I agree. Btw I have a concrete rule that I hopefully will never break. If I hold two aces against a slam, I will lead one of them. Every time I have seen this rule broken at the table the leader has come to regret it.
#5
Posted 2009-April-05, 10:03
#6
Posted 2009-April-05, 12:03
#7
Posted 2009-April-05, 14:25
jdonn, on Apr 5 2009, 10:44 AM, said:
kenrexford, on Apr 5 2009, 10:42 AM, said:
I agree. Btw I have a concrete rule that I hopefully will never break. If I hold two aces against a slam, I will lead one of them. Every time I have seen this rule broken at the table the leader has come to regret it.
Against a pair of insane friends, who were actually trying, I found myself on lead against 6NT with AK-A, and opted to lead my QJ10x suit. LOL
-P.J. Painter.
#9
Posted 2009-April-05, 19:08
jdonn, on Apr 5 2009, 10:44 PM, said:
kenrexford, on Apr 5 2009, 10:42 AM, said:
I agree. Btw I have a concrete rule that I hopefully will never break. If I hold two aces against a slam, I will lead one of them. Every time I have seen this rule broken at the table the leader has come to regret it.
rofl.
This comment reminds me of a famous hand, well famous in Australia anyway. Bridge author Tim Bourke was playing with the resident maniac, his regular partner at the time. Resident maniac is the model for David Bird's Brother Herman in the "monk books". Anyway, maniac hold 2 Aces against 6NT and doubles. He leads one and then decides he can get this off more than one, so switches to an off suit. Bourke now has to defend card perfectly to defeat the contract as the other Ace disappears into the ether. One off and many frayed nerves. At the end of the hand Bourke picks up his cards and throws them at the resident maniac together with some rather pithy comments.
#10
Posted 2009-April-05, 22:04
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
Our ultimate goal on defense is to know by trick two or three everyone's hand at the table. -- Mike777
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#12
Posted 2009-April-06, 09:50
cherdanno, on Apr 5 2009, 11:03 AM, said:
I don't understand. I hate the ace of spades lead, and if declarer has a spade void I assume you agree.
Now, which is more likely on this auction?
As for ducking a singleton, do I know it's a singleton? Can I see the rest of the hand? How do I know if I would duck?
#13
Posted 2009-April-07, 09:48
jdonn, on Apr 5 2009, 10:44 AM, said:
kenrexford, on Apr 5 2009, 10:42 AM, said:
I agree. Btw I have a concrete rule that I hopefully will never break. If I hold two aces against a slam, I will lead one of them. Every time I have seen this rule broken at the table the leader has come to regret it.
1♥-p-p-1♠
p-2♥-5♣-5♠
p-p-6♣-p
p-dbl-p-p
p
I wish I had known about Jdonn's rule before this hand came up.
I led ♦ 10.Declarer an old man claimed after the second trick when ♣ king came down.
Then he told us he had been feeling dizzy, not having taken his blood pressure pills,had not heard his partners call (no bidding boxes),and not called 5♣ on his first turn as he had not sorted his cards properly(!).Then he went to the washroom came back refreshed.
I was dizzy for the rest of the round.
Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.
"Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself, but talent instantly recognizes genius".
#14
Posted 2009-April-07, 12:08
jdonn, on Apr 6 2009, 10:50 AM, said:
cherdanno, on Apr 5 2009, 11:03 AM, said:
I don't understand. I hate the ace of spades lead, and if declarer has a spade void I assume you agree.
Now, which is more likely on this auction?
If I lead ♠A into declarer's void, I am unlikely to set up a trick, and the next thing I expect to see is declarer leading up a heart to dummy (after drawing trump). Which would mean I get even with the ♥A leaders, assuming I just take my ace without looking at dummy.
If I lead ♥A into declarer's void, the next thing I expect to see is declarer claiming.
I agree the spade void is more likely, but the lead into a spade void is far less disastrous.
#15
Posted 2009-April-07, 12:29
In other words, when a heart is wrong I think it's very likely we could never set him. When a spade is wrong, I think there is a very fair chance a heart could have set him.
#16
Posted 2009-April-07, 13:02
jdonn, on Apr 7 2009, 01:29 PM, said:
In other words, when a heart is wrong I think it's very likely we could never set him. When a spade is wrong, I think there is a very fair chance a heart could have set him.
(italics mine)
I guess that iss one point that I disagree with - RHO is also more likely to pass first round with a void in partner's suit.
I think the other reason why we differ is that I am just not as pessimistic as you. As long as we don't do anything disastrous on the opening lead, I expect to beat this.

Help

1♥-p-p-1♠
p-2♥-5♣-5♠
p-p-6♣-p
p-dbl-p-p
p