RHO opens 1♠. What's your call?
What's your call?
#1
Posted 2009-April-06, 02:13
RHO opens 1♠. What's your call?
#3
Posted 2009-April-06, 06:29
Quote
Is he supposed to look at his red-suit stops too?
#4
Posted 2009-April-06, 06:50
gnasher, on Apr 6 2009, 12:29 PM, said:
The 3♠ bid may include a red stopper, but usually not both. Pard acts accordingly.
5♣ is much more pragmatic than 3♠, which rates to be the unlucky expert bid. But hey, I've seen Rodwell doing it.
#5
Posted 2009-April-06, 07:34
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#6
Posted 2009-April-06, 08:05
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#7
Posted 2009-April-06, 08:06
whereagles, on Apr 6 2009, 02:50 PM, said:
seriously?
George Carlin
#9
Posted 2009-April-06, 09:00
#10
Posted 2009-April-06, 09:58
What have you seen Rodwell do exactly? Make the 3♠ bid, or make it on a hand with no outside stoppers? I remember neither such hand from Zia's book.
#11
Posted 2009-April-06, 10:10
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#12
Posted 2009-April-06, 10:11
Phil, on Apr 6 2009, 11:10 AM, said:
In a shocking twist of developments, whereagles' mind has not been changed!
#13
Posted 2009-April-06, 10:18
#14
Posted 2009-April-06, 10:19
lexlogan, on Apr 6 2009, 11:18 AM, said:
Does that apply if partner has the ace of diamonds and clubs are 2-1-2 around the table, so they don't even have a game?
#16
Posted 2009-April-06, 14:32
jdonn, on Apr 6 2009, 03:58 PM, said:
It was a similar hand, but with hearts instead. Played in some Pakistan-USA final.
It turned into an opening lead problem, as you set it with an unusual, though logic, lead (not found at table).
#17
Posted 2009-April-06, 15:12
whereagles, on Apr 6 2009, 03:32 PM, said:
jdonn, on Apr 6 2009, 03:58 PM, said:
It was a similar hand, but with hearts instead. Played in some Pakistan-USA final.
It turned into an opening lead problem, as you set it with an unusual, though logic, lead (not found at table).
I'll flip through the book tonight. I have my doubts that he would do such a thing with a long minor and no outside cards at all, but who knows maybe I forgot.
#18
Posted 2009-April-06, 15:31
#19
Posted 2009-April-06, 18:49
gwnn, on Apr 6 2009, 09:06 PM, said:
whereagles, on Apr 6 2009, 02:50 PM, said:
seriously?
Yes, Nuno is corrrect. In fact it was x and xx and the correct lead had to be found to beat it - it wasn't.

Help
