Hi,
You play with a good partner, he is better than you,
but since you hold my cards, this may not mean a lot.
You play a system, which is similar to SAYC, but you
did not really discuss a lot of things.
All red, in 3rd seat you hold
♠Q
♥A65
♦AJ9864
♣852
The auction developes as followes
1♠ ...... - (Pass) - 2♦ (1) . - (Pass)
2NT (2) - (Pass) - 3♦ ...... - (Pass)
3♥ (3) . - (Pass) - 3NT (4) - (Pass)
4♣ (5) . - (X) (6) - 4♥ (7) . - (Pass)
5♦ ....... - (Pass) - ??? (8)
(1) promising another bid
(2) not 12-14, i.e. +15, it is not 100% what the upper limit of the bid is
(3) not discussed, but you take it as value showing
(4) agree? If not, what would be your alternative bid?
(5) Cue, obviously agreeing diamonds
(6) may be based on xxx
(7) cue, comments?
(8) your bid?
With kind regards
Marlowe
Page 1 of 1
Your bid, add. values? - You be the Judge
#2
Posted 2009-February-28, 17:44
Pass
Partner decided against asking for keycards. I have shown my strength and hold 8 loser in a ♦ contract. I need partner to cover 6 of them to make 5♦. His ♦ holding / length will help in ♦ and maybe I can drop some loser on ♠ so the contract might make, but trying for more is unreasonable.
Partner decided against asking for keycards. I have shown my strength and hold 8 loser in a ♦ contract. I need partner to cover 6 of them to make 5♦. His ♦ holding / length will help in ♦ and maybe I can drop some loser on ♠ so the contract might make, but trying for more is unreasonable.
#3
Posted 2009-February-28, 18:08
I dislike the 3NT bid, partner can have ♣xx, 4♥ would had forced partner to make decide.
Now we need some imagination for finding out what partner has. I think he has ♥KQ, ♦KQ and ♣A. probably another club honnor as well. But we seem to lose at least 1♣ and 1♠ oppsite that. So pass.
Now we need some imagination for finding out what partner has. I think he has ♥KQ, ♦KQ and ♣A. probably another club honnor as well. But we seem to lose at least 1♣ and 1♠ oppsite that. So pass.
#4
Posted 2009-March-01, 04:21
(4) seems clear, but I wonder if at (7) we should have passed over 4C to find out what partner does next. Perhaps he might have redoubled to show particularly chunky clubs?
I assume we don't know what 4NT by partner would have meant over 4H? Because it's possible we want to play e.g. 6NT, rather than 6D if partner has
KJ10xx
Kx
KQx
AQx
Anyway, over 4H partner denied the ace of spades, and denied the king of clubs. Yet he had enough to move over 3NT. What can he have?
KJ10xx
KQx
KQx
Ax
?
It seems a guess where his 'spare' queen is, in hearts or in clubs (with neither he would have passed 3NT). Given the 3H bid, it is more likely it is in hearts - with AQ of clubs and Kxx of hearts, surely he would have raised diamonds immediately rather than bother with 3H?
By the way, you don't mention the form of scoring... at matchpoints there's less point playing this hand in 5D.
I assume we don't know what 4NT by partner would have meant over 4H? Because it's possible we want to play e.g. 6NT, rather than 6D if partner has
KJ10xx
Kx
KQx
AQx
Anyway, over 4H partner denied the ace of spades, and denied the king of clubs. Yet he had enough to move over 3NT. What can he have?
KJ10xx
KQx
KQx
Ax
?
It seems a guess where his 'spare' queen is, in hearts or in clubs (with neither he would have passed 3NT). Given the 3H bid, it is more likely it is in hearts - with AQ of clubs and Kxx of hearts, surely he would have raised diamonds immediately rather than bother with 3H?
By the way, you don't mention the form of scoring... at matchpoints there's less point playing this hand in 5D.
#5
Posted 2009-March-01, 05:34
Pard's bidding over 3NT means he surely has some 18-19 hcp. A slam should have some play for.
6♦ is risky because if pard's club control is the king, it might be crossed through at the lead. Better 6NT. You're not going to setup spades by ruff anyway...
6♦ is risky because if pard's club control is the king, it might be crossed through at the lead. Better 6NT. You're not going to setup spades by ruff anyway...
#6
Posted 2009-March-01, 09:26
Scoring: IMPs.
Team match over 12 bords.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Team match over 12 bords.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#7
Posted 2009-March-02, 02:41
I wonder why Frances likes 3 NT.
In SEF partner had not shown a club stopp,er just 15+ balanced. So 3 HEart had been a question about clubs or an advanced cuebid. So I had to bid 4 Diamond, or 4 Heart to deny my stopper.
But things developed well, partner showed that 3 HEart was an advanced cuebid.
I had tried pass over the double, but anyway, now I bid 6 ♦. I am minimum for my 2 ♦ bid, but all my points seem to work great, so I give it a try.
In SEF partner had not shown a club stopp,er just 15+ balanced. So 3 HEart had been a question about clubs or an advanced cuebid. So I had to bid 4 Diamond, or 4 Heart to deny my stopper.
But things developed well, partner showed that 3 HEart was an advanced cuebid.
I had tried pass over the double, but anyway, now I bid 6 ♦. I am minimum for my 2 ♦ bid, but all my points seem to work great, so I give it a try.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Page 1 of 1

Help
