BBO Discussion Forums: defense problem - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

defense problem

#1 User is offline   rbforster 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,611
  • Joined: 2006-March-18

Posted 2009-February-24, 23:05

In 2nd seat you hold the West hand and hear the following auction to 4, having made a double on your second bid.

Scoring: MP

(1)-P-(1)-P
(1NT)-X-(4)-AP

lead A, partner discourages


What's your plan for the defense?
0

#2 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2009-February-24, 23:19

If partner does not have the spade King, we probably better cash out here. If partner does have the spade King, then Declarer has at most 13 HCP, which likely include the heart Ace-King.

If I place partner with the club Queen for some reason and attack clubs on that long shot, then I force one club ruff in dummy. Then, Declarer might fall apart. So, at IMP scoring I might switch to a club. Playing Declarer for something like xx AKxxx QJx Jxx and maybe a mistake?

I just don't know at MP, though, that this makes sense.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#3 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2009-February-24, 23:51

Agree with ken's analysis althou I disagree we need partner to hold Q, we can just play a low club and declarer is not likelly letting this run to hand.
0

#4 User is offline   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,083
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2009-February-25, 06:01

K and another . I don't see how we're defeating this contract unless my partner has a trick in hearts and spades to go with my two diamonds, and then where is declarer's opening?.

 wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the 3.


 rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#5 User is offline   rbforster 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,611
  • Joined: 2006-March-18

Posted 2009-February-25, 07:50

Suppose the defense continues by switching to a low club. Declarer ruffs and leads a diamond to his Q and your K.

T1: A, x, 7, x (udca)
T2:x,x,x,x
T3: 8, x, Q, K

Now what?
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users