Those pesky opponents... Three level bids over 1NT
#21
Posted 2009-February-19, 07:26
For the Gerber rules "we" know, please look at the ACBL side, or in the SAYC booklet- or simply anywhere.
4 Club shows surprisingly some number of clubs.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#22
Posted 2009-February-19, 08:34
♠ Qxx
♥ Kxxx
♦ Ax
♣ AQJx
Club K was onside doubleton.
#23
Posted 2009-February-19, 09:09
#24
Posted 2009-February-19, 09:11
neilkaz, on Feb 18 2009, 11:00 PM, said:
jdonn, on Feb 18 2009, 06:02 PM, said:
dake50, on Feb 18 2009, 06:53 PM, said:
Sigh.....
Rule #1 although I should post this in B/I. If 4♣ can be natural it is not Gerber.
Rule #2 for most of us. If 4♣ can be some sort of splinter it is not Gerber.
I expect the rest of you to add a couple more rules for Gerber.
Rule #3 if we are supposed to play sensible bridge then 4♣ is never Gerber.
#25
Posted 2009-February-19, 10:25
matmat, on Feb 19 2009, 01:54 AM, said:
My thoughts exactly, a balanced hand with 5+♣
#26
Posted 2009-February-19, 11:22
TylerE, on Feb 18 2009, 10:43 PM, said:
Correction:
Over 4♣, partner will bid 4♦, back to you....
So many experts, not enough X cards.
#27
Posted 2009-February-19, 11:27
bid_em_up, on Feb 19 2009, 12:22 PM, said:
TylerE, on Feb 18 2009, 10:43 PM, said:
Correction:
Over 4♣, partner will bid 4♦, back to you....
Bingo. I was waiting for someone to finally say it...

Help
