BBO Discussion Forums: Slam contract with two aces missing - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Slam contract with two aces missing For polish club lovers...and all others

#1 User is offline   jahol 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 146
  • Joined: 2003-December-21

Posted 2009-February-17, 01:33

The board was:
Scoring: IMP


N-S bid Polish club with common competitive and slam bidding conventions. The bidding was:

West-------North------East-------South

...............................pass........1C(1)
pass..........1S(2)........3D..........4D
pass...........5C..........pass........6S
pass...........pass........pass

(1) - "Polish" club, 12-14 balanced, 15+ with club suit or 18+ all kinds of hands
(2) - 4+ spades, 7+ PC

One down, -10IMPs.

What is your opinion? Did North contribute more to the disaster, or South did?
0

#2 User is offline   david_c 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,178
  • Joined: 2004-November-14
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Mathematics;<br>20th century classical music;<br>Composing.

Posted 2009-February-17, 03:14

North gets 100% of the blame for his 5 bid. South's bidding did not suggest clubs. By going past 4NT, North made it impossible to discover the problem.
0

#3 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2009-February-17, 03:56

Okay North was not on the same wavelength with south, he thought that 4 Diamond does not gurantee a spade fit. In this case 5 club is understandable.

Shall 4 Diamond show spade support? I am not sure, what WJ2005 says, but I think it should. Strong club hands can bid 4 club, other hands can double bid 3 NT or bid their suit.

So North is guilty.

South was sure that 5 Club showed a control, obviously the ace and denied a heart control, so 6 Spade was clear cut.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#4 User is offline   pirate22 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 638
  • Joined: 2008-November-06
  • Location:asia at present time now HK time
  • Interests:Bridge- scuba-natural sex,no porn:)<br> Associate member I.B.P.A. workaholic

Posted 2009-February-18, 04:15

some of my best results are against precision bidders -----------
south is to blame----------- np 1c--1sp-- 3d what is south excited about his Q no value at present-south works on pards 7+ points(he may have more) bid 3 spades-then North will bid 4 cl.this is not ace showing (if it is north now bids 3n/t that shld put the brakes on south--play in 3n/t or 5 spades--over 3n/t if south wants to press on he could cue 4 diam-and north responds or just bids 4 spades regards
0

#5 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2009-February-18, 04:30

pirate22, on Feb 18 2009, 12:15 PM, said:

some of my best results are against precision bidders -----------
south is to blame----------- np 1c--1sp-- 3d what is south excited about his Q no value at present-south works on pards 7+ points(he may have more) bid 3 spades-then North will bid 4 cl.this is not ace showing (if it is north now bids 3n/t that shld put the brakes on south--play in 3n/t or 5 spades--over 3n/t if south wants to press on he could cue 4 diam-and north responds or just bids 4 spades regards

Txxxx
Tx
xxx
xxx

A game on a finesse??
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users