problem from last night you've seen similar before
#4
Posted 2009-February-16, 10:16
Making it easy for them to find a 4-4 spade fit might be good too.
What is baby oil made of?
#6
Posted 2009-February-16, 10:59
#7
Posted 2009-February-16, 11:25
You could even improve the hand slightly and I'd still overcall.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#8
Posted 2009-February-16, 19:35
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#9
Posted 2009-February-17, 03:15
I would double, np so far.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#10
Posted 2009-February-17, 08:16
#11
Posted 2009-February-17, 10:52
jdonn, on Feb 16 2009, 12:59 PM, said:
Another reason I like double (besides Josh's) is that I am ok with sitting for 4♠ if partner blasts that.
#12
Posted 2009-February-17, 10:53
Phil, on Feb 16 2009, 01:25 PM, said:
You could even improve the hand slightly and I'd still overcall.
IMO a singleton Q, K, or A is much different than a smaller singleton, and in practice is more like xx. Change the Q to J or lower and I agree that we cannot double with that hand.
#13
Posted 2009-February-17, 10:57
Phil, on Feb 16 2009, 12:25 PM, said:
You could even improve the hand slightly and I'd still overcall.
I think that's just cliche. If I'm going to rebid notrump then what's the difference? Partner won't insist on a 5 card suit, and if he insists on a 6 card suit then I'd say I have a much better dummy than most 2443 hands I could have.
My other excuse was there is no way I'm listening to what someone who would bid 2♦ on a GOOD 20+ count says about suicide.
#14
Posted 2009-February-17, 12:32
jdonn, on Feb 17 2009, 11:57 AM, said:
Phil, on Feb 16 2009, 12:25 PM, said:
You could even improve the hand slightly and I'd still overcall.
I think that's just cliche. If I'm going to rebid notrump then what's the difference? Partner won't insist on a 5 card suit, and if he insists on a 6 card suit then I'd say I have a much better dummy than most 2443 hands I could have.
Do you think the given hand is better than xx AK87 AK97 KQx for playing in spades?
#15
Posted 2009-February-17, 12:54
orlam, on Feb 17 2009, 01:32 PM, said:
jdonn, on Feb 17 2009, 11:57 AM, said:
Phil, on Feb 16 2009, 12:25 PM, said:
You could even improve the hand slightly and I'd still overcall.
I think that's just cliche. If I'm going to rebid notrump then what's the difference? Partner won't insist on a 5 card suit, and if he insists on a 6 card suit then I'd say I have a much better dummy than most 2443 hands I could have.
Do you think the given hand is better than xx AK87 AK97 KQx for playing in spades?
Yes. Although that's not the claim I was making.
#17
Posted 2009-February-17, 16:25
At the table, double or 2♦ would have worked but the actual 1NT did not.
Partner passed that with
♠A64 ♥JT93 ♦J832 ♣74
Diamonds come in so 3NT & 5♦ both make.

Help

Pd passes, East opens 1♥. You're next