Vul against Not, scoring IMPs
Playing SAYC, bidding goes
(P)-1♠-(P)-2♣
(P)-5♣-(P)-?
872 QJ Q3 KQT873
What is your next bid?
Page 1 of 1
Bid On?
#2
Posted 2009-February-14, 11:39
Considering that I have an aceless hand and a min 2♣ with a bunch of red quacks I pass quickly and hope to make it.
#3
Posted 2009-February-14, 12:47
In modern bridge fast arrival suggests minimum values. So if your partner if playing a modern style, pass is the obvious choice.
Now if you partner is playing a more traditional style, he still has the problem that SAYC has no clear game forcing raise in the minors. So I think that pass is the best choice.
Now if you partner is playing a more traditional style, he still has the problem that SAYC has no clear game forcing raise in the minors. So I think that pass is the best choice.
#5
Posted 2009-February-14, 13:22
hotShot, on Feb 14 2009, 07:47 PM, said:
Now if you partner is playing a more traditional style, he still has the problem that SAYC has no clear game forcing raise in the minors. So I think that pass is the best choice.
Partner could have been 3♣ forcing. Not sure if it's a game force but at least forcing to 4♣.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#6
Posted 2009-February-14, 14:03
Pass. If partner were even in the slightest manner be interested in slam, he would not bid 5C which is a signoff. With aceless hand and minimum [some might think subminimum because QJ hearts might not pull their full weight], Pass is truly automatic.
#7
Posted 2009-February-15, 20:23
This is one of the reasons I hate SAYC. I pass however... Principals opf fast arrival apply, and partner probably has a minimum, I hope I can make 5.
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
#8
Posted 2009-February-16, 03:02
Pass. My hand got worse, not better. Partner rates to have a club-spade two suiter in which my red suit queens are worthless. I also have the worst possible spade holding for a club contract.
Chris Gibson
Page 1 of 1

Help