BBO Discussion Forums: How proceed to 6C - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

How proceed to 6C Bidding

#21 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2009-February-10, 19:44


0

#22 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-February-11, 04:07

ArtK78, on Feb 11 2009, 02:44 AM, said:

By the way, it is quite clear to me that Ken thought the West hand was the opening bidder. I thought that for a while also. The presentation makes it look like the 2335 hand is the opener, not the 4414 hand.

Ah, that makes sense. Well, sort of: why wasn't he complaining about the 2♣ bid on a 4=4=1=4 shape, or challenging the 3♦ splinters on Axx?
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#23 User is offline   OleBerg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,950
  • Joined: 2008-April-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Copenhagen
  • Interests:Model-Railways.

Posted 2009-February-11, 05:47

Indeed.

Even stumbling into seven is no big disaster. (At Imps.)

Of course on the actual layout, it will present some problems. :)
_____________________________________

Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.

Best Regards Ole Berg

_____________________________________

We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:

- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.


Gnasher
0

#24 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2009-February-11, 09:21

gnasher, on Feb 11 2009, 10:07 AM, said:

ArtK78, on Feb 11 2009, 02:44 AM, said:

By the way, it is quite clear to me that Ken thought the West hand was the opening bidder. I thought that for a while also. The presentation makes it look like the 2335 hand is the opener, not the 4414 hand.

Ah, that makes sense. Well, sort of: why wasn't he complaining about the 2♣ bid on a 4=4=1=4 shape, or challenging the 3♦ splinters on Axx?

You are assuming that he ever cared to read what others posted lol.
0

#25 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2009-February-11, 09:24

OleBerg, on Feb 11 2009, 11:47 AM, said:

Of course on the actual layout, it will present some problems. :D

North has read a book that says you must lead trumps agains grands, WTP?

Sorry, on a trump lead the contract goes down, the book was right.
0

#26 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2009-February-11, 10:03

Just noticed all of this, and I did think that West opened. Duh!

My approach:

1♣-P-2♣-P-

(2♣ is artificial GF or LIM raise)

2♦-P-2NT-P-

(2♦ showed hearts, 2NT shows balanced with club support and GF)

3♠-P-4♣-P-

(3♠ showed 4441 with interest, 4♣ was a cue of two of the top three clubs; note that RKCB for clubs is no longer necessary)

4NT-P-5♥-P-

(4NT was RKCB, but Responder is to show the K and Q of hearts rather than the K/Q of clubs; 5♥ showed two without the heart Queen)

At this point, Opener knows that Responder has the heart King, solidifying the hearts for four tricks. The clubs are equally solidified for four tricks. With the known diamond Ace opposite, we also take a minimum of the two Aces and a diamond ruff. However, that gives Responder a mere 12-count with only four clubs, which is hardly a 2NT rebid. We clearly have 12 tricks somewhere, therefore. With solid hearts and solid-enough clubs, both Aces, and 12 seen, a grand try is in order.

Whatever Opener elects, Responder is looking at the fifth club and the third diamond and therefore has no problem bidding the grand.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#27 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-February-11, 17:42

kenrexford, on Feb 11 2009, 05:03 PM, said:

1♣-P-2♣-P-

(2♣ is artificial GF or LIM raise)

2♦-P-2NT-P-

(2♦ showed hearts, 2NT shows balanced with club support and GF)

3♠

(3♠ showed 4441 with interest

You were doing really well up to here, but surely now it's better for responder to be in control? He knows that three key cards and either ♥Q or ♠K is good enough for a grand slam (opposite Axxx AQxx it needs hearts 3-3 or a major-suit squeeze). Opener, on the other hand, can never know where the 13th trick is coming from unless he can find out that responder has only five major-suit cards.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users