I think that in old school standard a free bid of 1Nt show the same minimum strenght as 1Nt after a X.
(1S)------X--------(P)--------1Nt
Jx,x,AKQTx,AQTxx playing old school
#21
Posted 2009-February-04, 10:24
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#22
Posted 2009-February-04, 10:33
Given the usual garbage I tend to bid 3♣ with I feel forced to double now.
The high ODR of our hand might make 3♥ better to avoid big disasters.
The high ODR of our hand might make 3♥ better to avoid big disasters.
#23
Posted 2009-February-04, 19:28
benlessard, on Feb 4 2009, 11:24 AM, said:
I think that in old school standard a free bid of 1Nt show the same minimum strenght as 1Nt after a X.
(1S)------X--------(P)--------1Nt
(1S)------X--------(P)--------1Nt
In old school standard, a free bid of 3♣ also showed a lot more than a competitive 5-5
Hi y'all!
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#24
Posted 2009-February-04, 19:33
JLOL, on Feb 4 2009, 03:08 AM, said:
3H. I don't understand how we can make a non forcing and non forward going bid after partner has bid 1N freely.
We agree. This hand has two really good suits and loads of game potential.
#25
Posted 2009-February-04, 23:35
sorry about the confused post, I meant 8-10 and some 11 counts
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin

Help
