2♣ is non-forcing.
Page 1 of 1
How high?
#1
Posted 2009-February-03, 09:46
2♣ is non-forcing.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#2
Posted 2009-February-03, 09:57
5♦
I'll probably end there eventually, so I bid it at once.
I will not consider playing in hearts; 8-card suits are not side-suits.
I'll probably end there eventually, so I bid it at once.
I will not consider playing in hearts; 8-card suits are not side-suits.
_____________________________________
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
#3
Posted 2009-February-03, 10:19
4.5D
If you lose all hope, you can always find it again -- Richard Ford in The Sportswriter
#4
Posted 2009-February-03, 10:22
I think I open 5♦, it's just so likely opponents will interfere anyway and I can't have a reasonable auction in that case. Even if they don't interfere then it won't be easy to show this hand.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
#5
Posted 2009-February-03, 10:23
I like 5D. BTW for anyone considering 4D it shows the same as 1D p 1H p 4D would show.
New website: http://www.justinlall.com
#8
Posted 2009-February-03, 15:41
Apollo81, on Feb 3 2009, 02:16 PM, said:
Am I the only one who would have opened 4♦?
yep
New website: http://www.justinlall.com
#9
Posted 2009-February-03, 21:18
JLOL, on Feb 3 2009, 11:23 AM, said:
I like 5D. BTW for anyone considering 4D it shows the same as 1D p 1H p 4D would show.
Thats what I thought 4♦ did show. 5♦ now.
Would have preempted this 4♦ in the first place.
Hi y'all!
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#10
Posted 2009-February-04, 08:33
5♦ originally seems right...
5♦ now seems right...
5♦ later seems absurd, because you will be there eventually.
5♦ now seems right...
5♦ later seems absurd, because you will be there eventually.
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
#11
Posted 2009-February-04, 09:53
Phil, on Feb 3 2009, 11:18 PM, said:
JLOL, on Feb 3 2009, 11:23 AM, said:
I like 5D. BTW for anyone considering 4D it shows the same as 1D p 1H p 4D would show.
Thats what I thought 4♦ did show. 5♦ now.
Would have preempted this 4♦ in the first place.
aha! I knew I was not the only one
Page 1 of 1

Help

1♦ 1♠ dbl 2♣