Alerting 1NT? ?do you alert if you have a 5card major
#1
Posted 2009-January-29, 03:54
#3
Posted 2009-January-29, 04:09
#4
Posted 2009-January-29, 06:48
Under ACBL rules, a 1NT opening which by agreement can include a singleton, must be alerted, unless the singleton must always be a king or an ace. Other jurisdictions are not (AFAIK) explicit about this but I think it makes sense to follow the same principle there as well.
#5
Posted 2009-January-29, 06:54
#6
Posted 2009-January-29, 07:13
#7
Posted 2009-January-29, 07:40
mcphee, on Jan 29 2009, 07:54 AM, said:
No, everybody opens 1NT with 5 card majors, and there still is a box to check on the ACBL convention card. You are even allowed to open it with a singleton as long as you don't do it regularly or have an agreement about opening it with a singleton. Most 2=3=2=6 15 counts are opened 1NT, so are most 3=5=3=2 15 counts, I'm not sure about other NBOs, but in the ACBL this is most certainly not alertable.
#8
Posted 2009-January-29, 07:49
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#9
Posted 2009-January-29, 09:10
#10
Posted 2009-January-29, 10:02
andy_h, on Jan 29 2009, 08:49 AM, said:
With 3=7=0=3 and 3♥ in as ♦?
#11
Posted 2009-January-29, 10:51
#12
Posted 2009-January-29, 11:13
Call me Desdinova...Eternal Light
C. It's the nexus of the crisis and the origin of storms.
IV: ace 333: pot should be game, idk
e: "Maybe God remembered how cute you were as a carrot."
#13
Posted 2009-January-29, 11:16
Had he asked either before the round or during his turn about your 1NT opening style, something like "Do you allow 5-card major in 1NT opening and if Yes, under what conditions" then you need to answer that question in detail if you had ever discussed it with your partner. Not alertable still, even if discussed.
#14
Posted 2009-January-29, 18:00
mtvesuvius, on Jan 30 2009, 02:02 AM, said:
andy_h, on Jan 29 2009, 08:49 AM, said:
With 3=7=0=3 and 3♥ in as ♦?
No, I was serious lol It's their style and they believe in it pretty firmly.
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#15
Posted 2009-January-29, 18:06
andy_h, on Jan 29 2009, 07:00 PM, said:
mtvesuvius, on Jan 30 2009, 02:02 AM, said:
andy_h, on Jan 29 2009, 08:49 AM, said:
With 3=7=0=3 and 3♥ in as ♦?
No, I was serious lol It's their style and they believe in it pretty firmly.
They believe in getting bad boards firmly? Wow!
#16
Posted 2009-January-30, 02:28
mtvesuvius, on Jan 29 2009, 07:06 PM, said:
andy_h, on Jan 29 2009, 07:00 PM, said:
mtvesuvius, on Jan 30 2009, 02:02 AM, said:
andy_h, on Jan 29 2009, 08:49 AM, said:
With 3=7=0=3 and 3♥ in as ♦?
No, I was serious lol It's their style and they believe in it pretty firmly.
They believe in getting bad boards firmly? Wow!
I think I know the pair andy's talking about- it's all about whether the hand 'looks no-trumpy' to them.
Kx KJxxxxx Kx AQ might be an example. (Honors in doubleton suits, etc). 7-2-2-2's often play better in NT than in a suit.
--Always remember you're unique. Just like everyone else.
#17
Posted 2009-January-30, 03:19
I still find over 50% of "experts" aren't !
#18
Posted 2009-January-30, 04:44
the question as always is, under which regulation did you play.
In Germany you have to alert 1 NT, if the hand can be systemic
with an 5 card major.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)