After a preempt At the 2 level
#1
Posted 2008-December-19, 19:20
♠QJxxx
♥Jx
♦x
♣AKxxx
All Vulnerable, dealer opens 2♥ (weak), you're next...
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#2
Posted 2008-December-19, 20:00
What would i bid if my righty would not start with 2 ♥ weak single suiter? Say passed.
With my guru bridge partner
With a random partner I would bid 1♠
Yet I do not know "leaping michaels" is on or off in system card (tho a bit more HCP support or favorable vuln may need)
One can smoothly follow the room with classic 2 ♠ overcall. Yet 3rd and 4th unknown. So it all depends partner's best. Then believe me it does not matter even if passed. Say partner has 1NT values. lol. Noone can stop the game. (I know, i might be a daydreamer)
Who knows a trump contract easy but a sinking NT gets the money with a friendly lead in MPs.
Heureka ? ♥ Does p still sits opposite overcaller in following board ?
#3
Posted 2008-December-19, 20:04
2♠.
George Carlin
#4
Posted 2008-December-19, 20:22
#6
Posted 2008-December-19, 23:21
- hrothgar
#7
Posted 2008-December-20, 00:25
Sean
#8
Posted 2008-December-20, 00:36
gwnn, on Dec 19 2008, 09:04 PM, said:
2♠.
Exactly.
#10
Posted 2008-December-20, 05:17
Hanoi5, on Dec 20 2008, 01:20 AM, said:
♠QJxxx
♥Jx
♦x
♣AKxxx
All Vulnerable, dealer opens 2♥ (weak), you're next...
The hand is a little too weak for leaping Michaels so be satisfied with 1♠
#11
Posted 2008-December-20, 06:09
Tcyk, on Dec 20 2008, 12:17 PM, said:
That would be an unsufficient call...
2♠ wtp
#12
Posted 2008-December-20, 08:43
I hate my suit quality, but after hearing for many years in this forums that the guy with shortness has to act, I think I am also on the dark side now and bid 2♠.
#13
Posted 2008-December-20, 09:29
#14
Posted 2008-December-20, 17:07
I am still not convinced and need an opening to act in this position. I pass.
Second choice is of course 2 Spade and maby e with QJT9x of spades I would chose it. Even to think about NLM is an overbid.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#15
Posted 2008-December-20, 17:17
Codo, on Dec 20 2008, 06:07 PM, said:
This hand isn't an opening?
#16
Posted 2008-December-20, 18:34
- hrothgar
#17
Posted 2008-December-20, 19:17
maggieb, on Dec 21 2008, 08:17 AM, said:
Codo, on Dec 20 2008, 06:07 PM, said:
This hand isn't an opening?
It is, UR right, but I need a better hand then this to intervene in this position. Sorry for the wrong wording.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#18
Posted 2008-December-21, 21:50
Rooooooooooooooolanddddddddddddddddd!
#19
Posted 2008-December-22, 20:24

Help
