[csdenmark]

H_KARLUK, on Dec 14 2008, 11:12 AM, said:

mikestar, on Dec 13 2008, 12:30 AM, said:

I think Rozenkranz is on the right track when he calls these systems "dominant": the FP pair dominates the form the auction will take far more often than with non-FP systems.

Is the rationale that not easy for natural systems member players to effectively bid over methods which they're not familiar with ? (Particularly when the strong pass goal mainly depends obstructive in order to break up opp's bidding).

I would like to see Strong pass vs Strong Pass played hands samples. Yet my archive limitted with 1980+ records. Such as TRS etc.

Particularly when the strong pass goal mainly depends obstructive in order to break up opp's bidding
Hamid it is not so. Some non-serious adventure-minded persons try to ruin the game their way. Just as the regulators do in their way.

I have tried to describe the objectives for pass systems earlier, they are:

• Pushing opponents in the more difficult area of defensive bidding, in this thread named to be dominant. I prefer to name this as establishing comparative advantages
  
• Strict focus of what this game is about, a game about MAJORs. Whether you hold them or not