Page 1 of 1
man or mouse?
#1
Posted 2008-December-09, 10:51
All Vul, IMPs
♠AQJx
♥x
♦QJ9xxx
♣xx
(2♥)-p-(3♥)-?
If you're a passer, what's the minimum change to make a different call?
♠AQJx
♥x
♦QJ9xxx
♣xx
(2♥)-p-(3♥)-?
If you're a passer, what's the minimum change to make a different call?
#2
Posted 2008-December-09, 10:52
I'm in a passer and I don't think it is very close. You would have to add something like the club king to get me to double.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar
#3
Posted 2008-December-09, 12:37
I would double if you changed the ♦Q to the ♦K. Given that our alternative is to defend 3♥, we should be making doubles very very aggressively with this kind of hand.
#5
Posted 2008-December-09, 15:25
Double.
I do think it is close, perhaps I am influenced towards double by seeing the hand given as a problem.
Anyway, with a singleton heart, and AQJx of spades it is our job to be doubling here whenever we reasonably can.
I do think it is close, perhaps I am influenced towards double by seeing the hand given as a problem.
Anyway, with a singleton heart, and AQJx of spades it is our job to be doubling here whenever we reasonably can.
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
#6
Posted 2008-December-09, 15:47
I pass, it's too much of a stretch for me. I suspect I lie between han and clee somewhere.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
#7
Posted 2008-December-09, 16:02
I would double if I had a wire on the hand from my last bathroom break. Oh, wait, this isn't the 70s anymore.
I pass.
I pass.
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
#8
Posted 2008-December-09, 16:36
I'm an passer. Partner could not double or bid... Why make poor partner bid 4♣ and play his 4-2 fit? (Or you could double and correct to ♦ and play 6♦ doubled.) I would like at least 3 clubs to the King and a few other values. Granted, this may be a bit conservative, but considering what options partner had and will have available, it seems quite safe. Also: It's IMPs... So I lose six IMPs, big deal!! Compared to what could happen, I'd call it playing it safe.
AJK
AJK
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
#9
Posted 2008-December-09, 18:29
Mouse.
I'll regret this later, I'm quite sure.
I don't need much more... maybe even just take a ♦ and turn it into a ♣... but more likely I'm going to need another honor of some variety.
I'll regret this later, I'm quite sure.
I don't need much more... maybe even just take a ♦ and turn it into a ♣... but more likely I'm going to need another honor of some variety.
Kevin Fay
#10
Posted 2008-December-10, 02:58
Mighty mouse instead of dead man. Not close
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#11
Posted 2008-December-11, 02:20
benlessard, on Dec 10 2008, 05:58 PM, said:
Mighty mouse instead of dead man. Not close
Lovely, agree.
Add the King of clubs to make it close.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Page 1 of 1

Help
