Hand
#2
Posted 2008-November-30, 11:29
2♠ for me.
#3
Posted 2008-November-30, 11:31
#4
Posted 2008-November-30, 11:42
#5
Posted 2008-November-30, 11:46
- I play that 2♦ shows 5+♦ and 4♥...Not sure if I would bid 2♦ (lying 1 ♥) or 2♥.
#6
Posted 2008-November-30, 11:51
#7
Posted 2008-November-30, 12:11
given the meaning of 2S and the actual vulnerability,
I would go with 2H, ugly, but I have to live wit the
agreements I have made.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#8
Posted 2008-November-30, 12:24
Then, after the session, I'd tell my partner that weak/strong is a little old fashioned and all the modern types play it as any strength (at this vul). Then that I prefer specific 2-suiters ...
#9
Posted 2008-November-30, 12:26
#10
Posted 2008-November-30, 16:10
For every conventional upside, there is a downside.
#11
Posted 2008-November-30, 16:28
helene_t, on Nov 30 2008, 07:51 PM, said:
With only ♦ we bid 3♦ intermediate.
(We think that we have more often 2 suits to bid then 1 and therefor we play lot of 2 suited overcalls)
#12
Posted 2008-December-01, 02:28
So I bid 2 ♥. With adverse vul. this is an easy 2 ♠.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...

Help

(1♠)-?