MP Raise?
#1
Posted 2008-November-11, 07:52
2♦ on your right, alerted as 11-15, 5+ diamonds. You pass with ♠Axxx ♥QJxx ♦KQxx ♣x
LHO responds 2♥ (forcing and natural). Pard comes in with 2♠ and RHO raises to 3♥.
Your call?
#2
Posted 2008-November-11, 08:21
Nick
#3
Posted 2008-November-11, 08:23
I think it's pretty likely that 4♠ will make, though, so I'll just bid that.
#4
Posted 2008-November-11, 08:43
3♠.
#5
Posted 2008-November-11, 09:23
However, the danger in the heart suit is real, and I have reconsidered. I go back to the obvious 4♠ call.
#6
Posted 2008-November-11, 11:23
Kxxxxx x Jx QJxx game is OK, the two wasted QJ's notwithstanding.
George Carlin
#7
Posted 2008-November-11, 13:21
Usually.
#8
Posted 2008-November-11, 16:05
Besides, I surely do NOT want to defend 4♥, but would be okay spanking 5♥
#9
Posted 2008-November-11, 16:12
Harald
#10
Posted 2008-November-11, 17:52
skaeran, on Nov 11 2008, 05:12 PM, said:
I think it would be an error to bid 4♥. Partner is probably light given the vul and auction, so the chances of us finding a slam or something pale in comparison to the chances they would benefit by doubling a 4♥ bid.
#11
Posted 2008-November-11, 17:54
#13
Posted 2008-November-11, 19:58
I'm bidding 3♠.
If LHO does not have a diamond singleton, but partner instead, then you have diamond tricks coming in defense, which are wasted in a spade contract.
--Always remember you're unique. Just like everyone else.
#14
Posted 2008-November-12, 11:10
So many experts, not enough X cards.
#15
Posted 2008-November-12, 11:43
bid_em_up, on Nov 12 2008, 12:10 PM, said:
That never happens!
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#16
Posted 2008-November-12, 12:58
#17
Posted 2008-November-12, 14:36
#18
Posted 2008-November-12, 15:29
effervesce, on Nov 11 2008, 08:58 PM, said:
I'm bidding 3♠.
If LHO does not have a diamond singleton, but partner instead, then you have diamond tricks coming in defense, which are wasted in a spade contract.
I would give long odds against a diamond lead.. I agree with the fear of ruffs, but not at trick 2... think about it: I would guess a diamond lead would be the 3rd choice of opening lead. One of the reasons tbat most winning bridge players bid aggressively is that defence, and particularly the opening lead, is difficult. It is losing bridge to firstly imagine that a losing layout exists and then, to compound the problem, expect double-dummy defence in what amounts to a blind guess.
#19
Posted 2008-November-12, 16:30
mikeh, on Nov 12 2008, 04:29 PM, said:
effervesce, on Nov 11 2008, 08:58 PM, said:
I'm bidding 3♠.
If LHO does not have a diamond singleton, but partner instead, then you have diamond tricks coming in defense, which are wasted in a spade contract.
I would give long odds against a diamond lead.. I agree with the fear of ruffs, but not at trick 2... think about it: I would guess a diamond lead would be the 3rd choice of opening lead. One of the reasons tbat most winning bridge players bid aggressively is that defence, and particularly the opening lead, is difficult. It is losing bridge to firstly imagine that a losing layout exists and then, to compound the problem, expect double-dummy defence in what amounts to a blind guess.
Oops you're correct-for some reason I thought LHO would be leading.
Leading from Axxxx(x) would be very unlikely.
It's closer now, but I think 3♠ is still enough at MP.
--Always remember you're unique. Just like everyone else.
#20
Posted 2008-November-29, 16:26
Unless explicitly stated, none of my views here can be taken to represent SCBA or any other organizations.

Help
