BBO Discussion Forums: ok, humor me... - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

ok, humor me... Obama/McCain

Poll: Who'd you vote for? (60 member(s) have cast votes)

Who'd you vote for?

  1. Obama (46 votes [76.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 76.67%

  2. McCain (4 votes [6.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.67%

  3. Neither (10 votes [16.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.67%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   Lobowolf 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,030
  • Joined: 2008-August-08
  • Interests:Attorney, writer, entertainer.<br><br>Great close-up magicians we have known: Shoot Ogawa, Whit Haydn, Bill Malone, David Williamson, Dai Vernon, Michael Skinner, Jay Sankey, Brian Gillis, Eddie Fechter, Simon Lovell, Carl Andrews.

Posted 2008-November-12, 21:31

If you weren't eligible to vote (from a country other than the USA...underage...whatever), but would have voted for one of the two, please feel free to answer the poll as you would have voted.
1. LSAT tutor for rent.

Call me Desdinova...Eternal Light

C. It's the nexus of the crisis and the origin of storms.

IV: ace 333: pot should be game, idk

e: "Maybe God remembered how cute you were as a carrot."
0

#2 User is offline   Gerardo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 2,517
  • Joined: 2003-February-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Dartmouth, NS, Canada

Posted 2008-November-13, 03:25

Obama.

#3 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,397
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2008-November-13, 05:22

I think McCain would have been better for Europe. If I had been living in the US, I would probably have been selfish enough to vote for Obama. Or at least to vote against Palin, lol.

I voted "Neither". Maybe "Obama" would have been more honest. I dunno. If I had been a US voter I would obviously have made myself better informed.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#4 User is offline   Al_U_Card 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,080
  • Joined: 2005-May-16
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-November-13, 10:31

On Leno last night, McCain said that he was now sleeping like a baby.....waking every 2 hours and crying....

Almost makes me want to vote for him like I might have if I had not observed the last 6 months of the campaign...
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
0

#5 User is offline   kenberg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,277
  • Joined: 2004-September-22
  • Location:Northern Maryland

Posted 2008-November-13, 11:53

As promised, I voted for Obama and I wish him well. In the Post this morning there was an article about the reaction from Iran. Apparently a meeting without preconditions between heads of state is now being described as a devious plot by the United States. His welcoming introduction to world politics. Good luck, buddy, you will need all you can get.

Btw, Al, the "sleeping like a baby" is a very old joke. Leno needs to get a new crew of writers.
Ken
0

#6 User is offline   gauchy 

  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 2005-August-15

Posted 2008-November-13, 14:19

I would have voted Nader, because of his concern to environmentalism...
0

#7 User is offline   TimG 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,972
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maine, USA

Posted 2008-November-13, 15:35

gauchy, on Nov 13 2008, 03:19 PM, said:

I would have voted Nader, because of his concern to environmentalism...

I would have voted for Nader, too. In fact, I have in the past. But, this year I wanted my vote to count, even if it just added to the margin of victory.
0

#8 User is offline   Al_U_Card 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,080
  • Joined: 2005-May-16
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-November-13, 15:40

kenberg, on Nov 13 2008, 12:53 PM, said:

As promised, I voted for Obama and I wish him well. In the Post this morning there was an article about the reaction from Iran. Apparently a meeting without preconditions between heads of state is now being described as a devious plot by the United States. His welcoming introduction to world politics. Good luck, buddy, you will need all you can get.

Btw, Al, the "sleeping like a baby" is a very old joke. Leno needs to get a new crew of writers.

For sure, it was just more in character with the "character" that I had seen previously. He got pretty damn ridiculous toward the end of the campaign. Must have been the Palin factor....(puts the l in Pain...lol)
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
0

#9 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-November-13, 17:43

TimG, on Nov 13 2008, 03:35 PM, said:

gauchy, on Nov 13 2008, 03:19 PM, said:

I would have voted Nader, because of his concern to environmentalism...

I would have voted for Nader, too. In fact, I have in the past. But, this year I wanted my vote to count, even if it just added to the margin of victory.

Have you seen his post-election "Uncle Tom" interview comments? That might cure you from any temptation to ever vote for him again :P
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#10 User is offline   akhare 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,261
  • Joined: 2005-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-November-13, 18:14

cherdano, on Nov 13 2008, 06:43 PM, said:

TimG, on Nov 13 2008, 03:35 PM, said:

gauchy, on Nov 13 2008, 03:19 PM, said:

I would have voted Nader, because of his concern to environmentalism...

I would have voted for Nader, too. In fact, I have in the past. But, this year I wanted my vote to count, even if it just added to the margin of victory.

Have you seen his post-election "Uncle Tom" interview comments? That might cure you from any temptation to ever vote for him again :)

I was cured of that temptation after Florida 2000 :(....
foobar on BBO
0

#11 User is offline   Mosene 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 123
  • Joined: 2006-July-13

Posted 2008-November-13, 18:27

I voted for Cynthia McKiney (sp?). She was the Green Party candidate.
0

#12 User is offline   TimG 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,972
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maine, USA

Posted 2008-November-13, 21:13

cherdano, on Nov 13 2008, 06:43 PM, said:

TimG, on Nov 13 2008, 03:35 PM, said:

gauchy, on Nov 13 2008, 03:19 PM, said:

I would have voted Nader, because of his concern to environmentalism...

I would have voted for Nader, too. In fact, I have in the past. But, this year I wanted my vote to count, even if it just added to the margin of victory.

Have you seen his post-election "Uncle Tom" interview comments? That might cure you from any temptation to ever vote for him again :(

No, I haven't seen any post-election interviews. Maybe I will look for it.

I really do not know a whole lot about Nader; my votes for him have been more along the lines of "none of the above" than any real liking for Nader. The few things that I have heard him speak about have made sense to me, though.
0

#13 User is offline   jikl 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 558
  • Joined: 2004-October-08
  • Location:Victoria, Australia

Posted 2008-November-14, 01:00

Would Al Gore have had a chance? This is a serious question because who knows which party he would represent apart from Republican.

Sean
0

#14 User is offline   Lobowolf 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,030
  • Joined: 2008-August-08
  • Interests:Attorney, writer, entertainer.<br><br>Great close-up magicians we have known: Shoot Ogawa, Whit Haydn, Bill Malone, David Williamson, Dai Vernon, Michael Skinner, Jay Sankey, Brian Gillis, Eddie Fechter, Simon Lovell, Carl Andrews.

Posted 2008-November-14, 10:32

On a national platform, I don't think any third party candidate really has a chance. If you mean, would he have had a chance running in the Democratic primary and trying to get the nomination, maybe a very outside chance. If you mean running against both Obama and McCain, a la Ross Perot, I think all he would have done is win the election for McCain.

Edit: By "a very outside chance" I mean somewhere between 1% & 5%.
1. LSAT tutor for rent.

Call me Desdinova...Eternal Light

C. It's the nexus of the crisis and the origin of storms.

IV: ace 333: pot should be game, idk

e: "Maybe God remembered how cute you were as a carrot."
0

#15 User is offline   JoAnneM 

  • LOR
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 852
  • Joined: 2003-December-04
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:California

Posted 2008-November-14, 11:09

Nader is the "very old joke".
Regards, Jo Anne
Practice Goodwill and Active Ethics
Director "Please"!
0

#16 User is offline   JoAnneM 

  • LOR
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 852
  • Joined: 2003-December-04
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:California

Posted 2008-November-14, 11:13

Voting for a 3rd party candidate is doing nothing more than taking a vote away from either the Democrats or Republicans, and if you want your vote to mean absolutely nothing then go right ahead. I would rather make a positive statement and vote for someone who is running with a chance of winning.
Regards, Jo Anne
Practice Goodwill and Active Ethics
Director "Please"!
0

#17 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2008-November-14, 11:31

No vote means absolutely nothing. The fact that people believe they have reason to vote for a person who is not their first choice makes the whole system not work. I strongly disagree with voting your preference out of who has a chance to win if it's not your first choice. That gives people crazy ideas like that 50 million people want George Bush to be president from time to time.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#18 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-November-14, 11:41

I don't disagree in principle with voting for a candidate with no chance of winning. But the main point Nader supporters seem to have made in 2000 was "there is no difference between Gore and Bush anyway".
I guess Nader still thinks that is true...
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#19 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2008-November-14, 11:43

I actually think the best system theoretically would be to deduce the true opinion of each voter about each candidate on a scale of say 0 to 10 and then add up the total points. Of course it would never work in practice, mostly because people would rate their favorite 10 and everyone else 0.

Such a system would surely have worked against Obama this year...
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#20 User is offline   TimG 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,972
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maine, USA

Posted 2008-November-14, 12:01

JoAnneM, on Nov 14 2008, 12:13 PM, said:

Voting for a 3rd party candidate is doing nothing more than taking a vote away from either the Democrats or Republicans, and if you want your vote to mean absolutely nothing then go right ahead. I would rather make a positive statement and vote for someone who is running with a chance of winning.

I don't think settling for a major party candidate when you think someone else would make a better President is necessarily a "positive statement".
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

4 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users