Double by 1NT opener sanity check
#1
Posted 2008-November-10, 11:25
1NT - (2♦ natural) - Pass - Pass - X
What should opener's double mean? Does it depend on what responder's double of 2♦ would have been? Obviously this is a matter of partnership agreement, but some agreements might be unreasonable....
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#2
Posted 2008-November-10, 11:47
However, if responder's double is takeout, so is opener's.
#3
Posted 2008-November-10, 11:49
the meaning of responders double is important,
if responders double would be for t/o, than opener
is forced to reopen.
If it would be optional / penalty, most likely t/o makes
more sense, but ...
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#4
Posted 2008-November-10, 11:52
1NT-P-P-2♦ (natural);
X
would be penalty, conversely; opener in that case could have a decent stack of minor honors and quite a few outside quick tricks.
Call me Desdinova...Eternal Light
C. It's the nexus of the crisis and the origin of storms.
IV: ace 333: pot should be game, idk
e: "Maybe God remembered how cute you were as a carrot."
#5
Posted 2008-November-10, 11:55
#6
Posted 2008-November-10, 11:58
If responder's double is penalty, then responder could still have takeout shape, so a takeout double by opener seems even more important.
#7
Posted 2008-November-10, 12:19
It's not penalty seat - competitive
#8
Posted 2008-November-10, 15:27
jdonn, on Nov 10 2008, 06:55 PM, said:
Agree 100%
#9
Posted 2008-November-10, 15:38
Free, on Nov 10 2008, 04:27 PM, said:
jdonn, on Nov 10 2008, 06:55 PM, said:
Agree 100%
It's ok to play penalty doubles behind the bidder. We do that even with our 12-14 notrumps!
In front of the bidder it surely should be takeout.
#10
Posted 2008-November-10, 16:22
#11
Posted 2008-November-11, 01:57
MFA, on Nov 10 2008, 10:38 PM, said:
Free, on Nov 10 2008, 04:27 PM, said:
jdonn, on Nov 10 2008, 06:55 PM, said:
Agree 100%
It's ok to play penalty doubles behind the bidder. We do that even with our 12-14 notrumps!
In front of the bidder it surely should be takeout.
I've also thought about this years ago. However this is a foolish style, and I'll explain why.
Your partner can also Dbl. Using the style you mention, in an auction 1NT-(2♦)-... partner has a penalty double, while you have a takeout double. And guess what: usually you both would double in such a situation (because partner is long, opener is short). Similar if it's the other way around, or if the auction goes 1NT-(p)-p-(2♦)-...
So you lose options playing this style, while either penalty doubles for both players, or takeout doubles (best imo) for both players have more possibilities.

Help
