Bidding Strong Two Suiters
#1
Posted 2004-April-19, 07:08
1) Do you open 2C?
2) If you do, you hear 2D (0 or 1 King). What next? All bids are natural and forcing to 3 of major.
♠A
♥AKQ976
♦A
♣K9854
#3
Posted 2004-April-19, 08:04
If I play Kokish I will open 2♣, which is also forcing upto 3 of a major or 2NT.
If they interfere with a suit it makes it actually somewhat easier. If my pd X, he has less then 2 Queens, if he passes he has King or more.
Mike
so much the better. If there is restlessness, I am pleased. Then let there
be ideas, and hard thought, and hard work.”
#4
Posted 2004-April-19, 08:06
Trpltrbl, on Apr 19 2004, 09:04 AM, said:
Mike
What will you do over thier 4♠ if he showed to have K or more ?
Two bad options are double for 1/2 down when 6/7 is cold or bid on and go down when they were going 3/4 down in 4♠
#5
Posted 2004-April-19, 08:29
Flame, on Apr 19 2004, 09:06 AM, said:
Trpltrbl, on Apr 19 2004, 09:04 AM, said:
Mike
What will you do over thier 4♠ if he showed to have K or more ?
Two bad options are double for 1/2 down when 6/7 is cold or bid on and go down when they were going 3/4 down in 4♠
Then I don't think it matters if you open 1♥ or 2♣, if opps are going to bid 4♠. They re obviuosly bidding on shape. So they will no matter what I open
And I will bid 5♥, since X by me would show a balanced NT hand. Sometimes preemptive bidding, especially in ♠, just works.
Mike
so much the better. If there is restlessness, I am pleased. Then let there
be ideas, and hard thought, and hard work.”
#6
Posted 2004-April-19, 09:01
Trpltrbl, on Apr 19 2004, 09:29 AM, said:
Flame, on Apr 19 2004, 09:06 AM, said:
Trpltrbl, on Apr 19 2004, 09:04 AM, said:
Mike
What will you do over thier 4♠ if he showed to have K or more ?
Two bad options are double for 1/2 down when 6/7 is cold or bid on and go down when they were going 3/4 down in 4♠
Then I don't think it matters if you open 1♥ or 2♣, if opps are going to bid 4♠. They re obviuosly bidding on shape. So they will no matter what I open
And I will bid 5♥, since X by me would show a balanced NT hand. Sometimes preemptive bidding, especially in ♠, just works.
Mike
Ofcouse they bid on shape, but this is where bidding 1h give you an advantage over bidding 2c, if you opened 1h, you later bid 4c or even 5c and from there and later double, and you feel confortable because you showed you have lots of hearts and club and a strong hand, partner can take charge and decide for us.
but when you bid 2c you are less likely to show what you got and will have to make the last guess.
I strongly advice reading partnership bidding avaliable free on Daniel's site.
#7
Posted 2004-April-19, 10:01
Flame, on Apr 19 2004, 10:01 AM, said:
but when you bid 2c you are less likely to show what you got and will have to make the last guess.
Good point, it's just that last few times I had similair hand I got to play 1♥. So I will adjust my statement, if I know my opps like to bid a lot I will open 1 ♥, and if my opps don't like to interfere I will open 2♣ hehehe
Mike
so much the better. If there is restlessness, I am pleased. Then let there
be ideas, and hard thought, and hard work.”
#8
Posted 2004-April-19, 10:06
Because of these things, I started to play transfer preempts with strong two-suiters in these openings (example 3♦-opening = preempt ♥ OR GF 55+ ♠ and a minor). You show your shape immediatly, even if they intervene, and the transfer preempts don't have as much disadvantages as some people say. I've played them for a few years now, and haven't had any problems at all.
These strong 55+ hands are pretty frequent, and we have great slam approach after these bids. On my last clubnight, I had one with both minors, and we got into 6NT laydown. There were only 2 pairs who found 6NT, all others played 3NT+3
If you don't play special methods for these kind of hands, I think it's better to open 1X in the long run. So here I'd rather open 1♥ than 2♣.
#9
Posted 2004-April-19, 17:08
Had I had an abberation and opened 2C as an experiment what is wrong with now bidding 2H over 2D? Surely if there has been no intervention that is what you wanted to do, so what is the problem?
#10
Posted 2004-April-20, 04:50
If you play some only strenght showing responses it may go like this:
2♣-2NT (whatever)
3♥-4♦ and now 7♣ become unreachable
Even if you play natural
2♣-2♠
3♥-4♦ again althou less probable, still 7♣ could be the best (maybe not on this hand, but on other 2 suiters it often is)
Having a 2 suiter garantees opponents or partner have some interesting shapes, so opening 1X is much better, at least in my opinion.
#11
Posted 2004-April-20, 05:18
Also, the second example you give, these days 2♠ would usually mean a weak hand with long ♠s. So 7♣ is impossible! If you play a 2M response natural and strong, then you shouldn't open 2♣ for sure!!
#12
Posted 2004-April-20, 09:03
If partner did bid 2♦, i would bid 2♥.

Help