BBO Discussion Forums: Coping with an enemy jump overcall - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Coping with an enemy jump overcall

#1 User is offline   TimG 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,972
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maine, USA

Posted 2008-November-03, 12:07

Playing vanilla 2/1 with agreed upon sound openings, red v white at IMPs, you hold:

♠T ♥T62 ♦9653 ♣AKJT3

and see (P)-1♦-(3♠)-? to you. What action do you take?

If you pass, is

♠T ♥T962 ♦653 ♣AKJT3

enough of a change to get a negative double from you?
0

#2 User is offline   TylerE 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,778
  • Joined: 2006-January-30

Posted 2008-November-03, 12:36

Pass is both cases. P most likely has a weak NT...I don't really forsee taking that many tricks. Yes, I'm selling out and I don't like it. Bidding could easily result in -200 on a bad day, don't feel like there is an obvious plus to protect against, so I'll take my +50 or +100 defending 3♠.
0

#3 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2008-November-03, 12:52

I would bid 4♦ on the first. 4432 with partner would suck but I would just consider it very unlucky if partner had that. I generally want to be in there if he has other shapes since he is probably too long in spades to reopen.

On the second I would double, it's pretty sick but it just feels right to me to be in there. If partner passes I don't expect a huge number (though we might....), but I don't see it as a problem either.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#4 User is offline   RichMor 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 279
  • Joined: 2008-July-15
  • Location:North Central US

Posted 2008-November-03, 14:39

Agree with jdonn. You gotta get in there and try for those vulnerable games.
0

#5 User is offline   effervesce 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 885
  • Joined: 2007-March-28

Posted 2008-November-03, 20:18

I double on both.

If partner has xxx AKxx AKxx xx 4♥ has play on the first hand, and is one you want to be on the second hand.
Ming

--Always remember you're unique. Just like everyone else.
0

#6 User is offline   655321 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,502
  • Joined: 2007-December-22

Posted 2008-November-03, 20:32

The first hand, probably 4♦, but I find this one tough.
In favor of bidding is that we have the spade shortage, and a fit for partner.
Against bidding is that we don't have that great of a hand, we would be bidding at the 4 level, and yes, partner often does have a weak notrump.
I don't like double though.

I double on the second hand, and feel comfortable doing it.
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
0

#7 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2008-November-04, 01:48

I pass the first, even if he has 4 Diamonds we are beyond the law level. I would need a 5. diamond for that.
I pass the second too.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#8 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2008-November-04, 17:03

pass 1st, dbl 2nd
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users