What is the least you would never pass with?
#1
Posted 2008-October-26, 12:38
#2
Posted 2008-October-26, 13:17
#4
Posted 2008-October-26, 13:39
#5
Posted 2008-October-26, 13:47
#6
Posted 2008-October-26, 13:59
DrTodd13, on Oct 26 2008, 10:47 PM, said:
With 18 I would expect 3♣ instead of 2♣. Most of the time my partner will be closer to 11 than to 17. Wouldn't you open with ♠xx-♥xx-♦AKxxx-♣Axxx?
#7
Posted 2008-October-26, 14:00
You admit 2♣ could be 17 so why would you ever pass with 10 or even 8?
#8
Posted 2008-October-26, 14:06
DrTodd13, on Oct 26 2008, 11:00 PM, said:
You admit 2♣ could be 17 so why would you ever pass with 10 or even 8?
I voted for 10, so I wouldn't pass with 10. And I gave an example hand with which I would pass with 9. And it had a fit. What would you bid with it?
#9
Posted 2008-October-26, 14:16
ochinko, on Oct 26 2008, 12:06 PM, said:
DrTodd13, on Oct 26 2008, 11:00 PM, said:
You admit 2♣ could be 17 so why would you ever pass with 10 or even 8?
I voted for 10, so I wouldn't pass with 10. And I gave an example hand with which I would pass with 9. And it had a fit. What would you bid with it?
3♣ seems pretty normal there.
#10
Posted 2008-October-26, 14:19
Therefore is must try to find a bid with 8, but that won't always be possible.
Still I voted 8.
Finding your own mistakes is more productive than looking for partner's. It improves your game and is good for your soul. (Nige1)
#11
Posted 2008-October-26, 14:25
DrTodd13, on Oct 26 2008, 11:16 PM, said:
ochinko, on Oct 26 2008, 12:06 PM, said:
DrTodd13, on Oct 26 2008, 11:00 PM, said:
You admit 2♣ could be 17 so why would you ever pass with 10 or even 8?
I voted for 10, so I wouldn't pass with 10. And I gave an example hand with which I would pass with 9. And it had a fit. What would you bid with it?
3♣ seems pretty normal there.
Realistically opener will have 12-14 most of the time. If you want him to accept with good 14, you should have more than 5-6, no?
Let's turn the table now. You open with xx-Kx-AQxxx-KQxx. If it goes 1♦-1♠-2♣-2NT do you pass now because you expect as little as 7 points or less?
#12
Posted 2008-October-26, 14:33
- hrothgar
#13
Posted 2008-October-26, 14:38
While it is true that there is a downside in passing with such a hand (you could miss a game) there is also a downside to bidding with such a hand (you could get too high).
In the end, bridge is a game of probabilities. Regardless of how you answer this question you will win some of the time and lose some of the time. In order to come up with a proper answer to this question you need to take into account both the risks and the rewards of the various answers (as well as the relative likelyness of various outcomes).
Thinking only about "the risk of missing game" is not sufficient for coming up with the correct answer.
Fred Gitelman
Bridge Base Inc.
www.bridgebase.com
#14
Posted 2008-October-26, 14:54
- hrothgar
#15
Posted 2008-October-26, 15:54
ochinko, on Oct 26 2008, 12:25 PM, said:
DrTodd13, on Oct 26 2008, 11:16 PM, said:
ochinko, on Oct 26 2008, 12:06 PM, said:
DrTodd13, on Oct 26 2008, 11:00 PM, said:
You admit 2♣ could be 17 so why would you ever pass with 10 or even 8?
I voted for 10, so I wouldn't pass with 10. And I gave an example hand with which I would pass with 9. And it had a fit. What would you bid with it?
3♣ seems pretty normal there.
Realistically opener will have 12-14 most of the time. If you want him to accept with good 14, you should have more than 5-6, no?
Let's turn the table now. You open with xx-Kx-AQxxx-KQxx. If it goes 1♦-1♠-2♣-2NT do you pass now because you expect as little as 7 points or less?
I think that 2N should show more strength than a preference to one of opener's minors. Maybe with a very weak hand one should bid 2♦ (with at least 2♦) even with 4+♣ to give opener another chance. Personally, I think if my system presented me with this problem then I wouldn't play that system given there are other systems that don't have nearly as huge a hole in it. Still, when in doubt, overbid. With a terrible misfit I'd look to get out as cheap as possible but if I have any kind of a fit I'd strive to bid again. True, we might end up at 3♣ with 18 points but that isn't necessarily a bad thing.
#16
Posted 2008-October-26, 16:46
rogerclee, on Oct 26 2008, 02:20 PM, said:
I thought you were all about talking about the bridge instead of personal attacks
#17
Posted 2008-October-26, 18:02
Lets call 8 pointers 60-40 bid.
#18
Posted 2008-October-26, 19:19
ochinko, on Oct 26 2008, 03:25 PM, said:
Let's turn the table now. You open with xx-Kx-AQxxx-KQxx. If it goes 1♦-1♠-2♣-2NT do you pass now because you expect as little as 7 points or less?
Not all continuations suggest opener should "accept" with a good 14.
Preference to diamonds leaves the auction open, but doesn't mean opener should be bidding game with his good 14s. He will bid again, however, when he has 17 or 18.
You example auction, 1♦-1♠-2♣-2N, suggests a different strength hand than a mere preference to 2♦. I would expect around 10-11 for this 2N rebid.
#19
Posted 2008-October-26, 19:35
#20
Posted 2008-October-26, 20:18

Help
