I checked the odds using Pavlicek's suit break calculators.
Hearts 3-2 is 53.9%, and singleton ♥J either way is 7.3%.
Hearts 4-1 and clubs 3-3 is 11.3%, so 5/7 of that (diamond finesse on) is 8.1%.
So altogether the squeeze line is 69%, which seems slightly better than the heart finesse.
(I ignored Mike's comments about picking up ♣Jx as in this case either hearts are running or the squeeze can't work.)
Of course the difference is negligible, but I guess we intuitively underestimate how much the singleton ♥J adds as a chance.
your move
#21
Posted 2008-October-08, 17:02
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
#22
Posted 2008-October-08, 17:29
In my regular partnerships, 4NT is RKCB for diamonds.
I agree that if 4NT is natural, it is a reasonable bid.
I agree that if 4NT is natural, it is a reasonable bid.
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
#23
Posted 2008-October-09, 02:14
cherdano, on Oct 9 2008, 12:02 AM, said:
I checked the odds using Pavlicek's suit break calculators.
Hearts 3-2 is 53.9%, and singleton ♥J either way is 7.3%.
Hearts 4-1 and clubs 3-3 is 11.3%, so 5/7 of that (diamond finesse on) is 8.1%.
So altogether the squeeze line is 69%, which seems slightly better than the heart finesse.
Hearts 3-2 is 53.9%, and singleton ♥J either way is 7.3%.
Hearts 4-1 and clubs 3-3 is 11.3%, so 5/7 of that (diamond finesse on) is 8.1%.
So altogether the squeeze line is 69%, which seems slightly better than the heart finesse.
I think you've double-counted the cases where ♥J is singleton, but the requirements for the squeeze also exist. You only get 4/5 of 8.1, so the overall probability of success is 60%.
That's still better than the heart finesse, which seems to be 57.4%.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn

Help
