RHO opens 1 NT (15-17) and your bid is...?
Your bid
#1
Posted 2008-October-02, 01:01
RHO opens 1 NT (15-17) and your bid is...?
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#2
Posted 2008-October-02, 01:52
I have the convention available and see no reason not to use it on this nice hand.
Finding your own mistakes is more productive than looking for partner's. It improves your game and is good for your soul. (Nige1)
#3
Posted 2008-October-02, 03:35
dicklont, on Oct 2 2008, 02:52 AM, said:
I have the convention available and see no reason not to use it on this nice hand.
I voted 2NT as well.
But they are red, if they go down, we will get 100,
or maybe 200, ..., and 3m may not make.
The main problem is of course, that 2H will come
back, and I have to answer the same question,
maybe with a little more information, so pass may
well be best, and my action of the table.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#4
Posted 2008-October-02, 05:36
Harald
#5
Posted 2008-October-02, 06:57
skaeran, on Oct 2 2008, 06:36 AM, said:
exactly
#6
Posted 2008-October-02, 07:56
I think I'll try 2♣ however.
#7
Posted 2008-October-02, 09:50
Flameous, on Oct 2 2008, 05:56 AM, said:
I think I'll try 2♣ however.
Yes, I like the idea of 2♣ if its clubs + a higher followed be a double of 2♥.
I'm not familiar with Codo's defense to 1N. What is 2♣ over 1N?
#8
Posted 2008-October-02, 09:52
pclayton, on Oct 2 2008, 10:50 AM, said:
Flameous, on Oct 2 2008, 05:56 AM, said:
I think I'll try 2♣ however.
Yes, I like the idea of 2♣ if its clubs + a higher followed be a double of 2♥.
I'm not familiar with Codo's defense to 1N. What is 2♣ over 1N?
Majors? It's really not so different from Woolsey with penalty doubles.
#9
Posted 2008-October-02, 09:57
jdonn, on Oct 2 2008, 07:52 AM, said:
pclayton, on Oct 2 2008, 10:50 AM, said:
Flameous, on Oct 2 2008, 05:56 AM, said:
I think I'll try 2♣ however.
Yes, I like the idea of 2♣ if its clubs + a higher followed be a double of 2♥.
I'm not familiar with Codo's defense to 1N. What is 2♣ over 1N?
Majors? It's really not so different from Woolsey with penalty doubles.
Or 2♦ showing any single suiter, or 2♠ showing shorter spades and a longer minor.
More differences than similarities I think.

Help
